Plant-e, Plant-e Knowledge v. Arkyne Technologies S.L.

Chint New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.vsJingAo Solar Co., Ltd.

Chint appealed an order of the Munich Local Division requiring it to provide security for costs in the amount of €200,000 by 6 June 2025, in proceedings concerning alleged infringement of JingAo's European patent EP 2 787 541 relating to a solar cell. Chint requested that its appeal have suspensive effect or, alternatively, that the appeal proceedings be expedited. The Court of Appeal rejected both requests, finding that the appeal would not become devoid of purpose without suspensive effect and that Chint had failed to demonstrate that providing security constituted an undue burden or that expedition was warranted.

Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.vsTP-Link Systems Inc. and Others (Netgear Deutschland GmbH and Others as Respondents before Court of First Instance)

The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court dismissed Huawei's appeals against an order of the Local Chamber Munich granting TP-Link access to certain redacted documents filed in infringement proceedings between Huawei and Netgear concerning EP 3 678 321. The court held that TP-Link had a legitimate interest in accessing the documents because Huawei was suing TP-Link for infringement of the same patent, and that Huawei failed to comply with the procedural requirements for claiming confidentiality under Rule 262.2 of the Rules of Procedure.

Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. LimitedvsTesla Germany GmbH & Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE

This is a decision of the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court concerning the withdrawal of claims in proceedings related to European Patent EP 1 612 910. Following a first instance decision by the Local Division Hamburg that partially revoked the patent and dismissed the infringement claim, both parties sought to withdraw their respective claims. The Court of Appeal allowed the withdrawals, declared the appeal proceedings terminated, and ordered a 60% refund of court fees to Avago.

KEEEX SASvsAdobe Systems Software Ireland Limited, Adobe Inc., Open AI OpCo LLC, Open AI Ireland Ltd, TruePic Inc., Joint Development Foundation Projects LLC, Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA)

This case concerns a request for a default decision in an ongoing patent infringement action (UPC_CFI_530/2025) before the Local Division Paris. Adobe sought a default decision against KEEEX for failing to provide a bank guarantee for costs within the deadline set by an order of December 19, 2025. The court rejected Adobe's request, finding that KEEEX had acted diligently by providing proof of blocked funds within the deadline and subsequently furnishing the required bank guarantee documents shortly after receiving clarifications from the judge-rapporteur.

Edwards Lifesciences CorporationvsMeril Gmbh & Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.

This is an order from the Local Division Munich of the Unified Patent Court concerning EP 3 646 825, dealing with procedural applications following a prior infringement decision. Meril (the defendants) sought an extension of the deadline to comment on Edwards Lifesciences' application for a cost decision, arguing that pending confidentiality issues prevented them from properly responding. The judge-rapporteur lifted all deadlines relating to the cost decision and the protection of confidential information, with new deadlines to be set in due course.