Short Summary
Unified Patent Court decision.
Practitioner Note
This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before Munich (DE) Local Division. Understanding the court's reasoning in Edwards Lifesciences Corporation vs Meril GmbH is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.
Related Cases
Emboline, Inc.vsAorticLab srl
This order from the Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court addresses the procedural treatment of conditional counterclaims for revocation. The Court of Appeal clarified that making a counterclaim for revocation conditional upon a finding of infringement is permissible, and provided guidance on how the counterclaimant should proceed if the infringement claimant appeals a finding of non-infringement by the Court of First Instance.
Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.vsexpert e-Commerce GmbH, expert klein GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
NJOY Netherlands BVvsVMR Products LLC
Unified Patent Court decision.
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbHvsAmgen, Inc.
Unified Patent Court decision.
Edwards Lifesciences CorporationvsMeril Italy srl
Unified Patent Court decision.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.
Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.