Software — European UPC Patent Cases
2 decisions indexed
Page 1 of 1 · 2 total
KEEEX SAS v.ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LIMITED, ADOBE INC., OPEN AI OPCO LLC, OPEN AI IRELAND LTD, TRUEPIC INC., JOINT DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION PROJECTS LLC, COALITION FOR CONTENT PROVENANCE AND AUTHENTICITY (C2PA)
This is a procedural order from the Unified Patent Court (Local Division Paris) in an infringement action brought by KEEEX SAS based on European patent EP2949070 against multiple defendants including Adobe, OpenAI, TruePic, and C2PA-related entities. The defendants sought to strike certain arguments, evidence, and a new patent amendment request from KEEEX's memorandum of June 5, 2026, as inadmissible and tardy. The judge-rapporteur largely granted the defendants' requests, striking most new infringement arguments and the new amendment request, while permitting limited additional submissions under Rule 36 RoP on specific points.
KEEEX SAS v.ADOBE INC. and ADOBE SYSTEMS SOFTWARE IRELAND LIMITED
This case concerns a discretionary review (Rule 220.3) filed by Adobe Inc. and Adobe Systems Software Ireland Limited against an order of the Paris Local Division of the Unified Patent Court. The dispute centers on whether KEEEX SAS could introduce a provisional damages claim (€100 million material and €20 million moral) in its reply brief after having initially claimed over €6.6 billion in damages and then agreeing to withdraw that claim. The Court of Appeal rejected the discretionary review, finding the contested order was not manifestly erroneous.
Dealing with a patent challenge?
Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.