Judge Profile

rapporteur granted the Claimant until

3 IP cases indexed. Covers patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

3 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent LITIGATION · Apr 28, 2025

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v.ASUSTek Computer Inc., Arvato Netherlands B.V., Digital River Ireland Ltd.

Milan (IT) Local Division · UPC-000747

This case concerns a patent infringement action filed by Ericsson against ASUSTek and related entities regarding patent EP3076673, along with a counterclaim for revocation. The core dispute centered on the confidentiality regime to be applied to certain documents designated as confidential by the Defendants. The Court rejected Ericsson's request for an 'external eyes only' confidentiality regime and established a confidentiality club allowing access to specific external representatives, expert witnesses, and one natural person from each party.

patent LITIGATION · Apr 28, 2025

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v.ASUSTek Computer Inc., Arvato Netherlands B.V., and Digital River Ireland Ltd.

Milan (IT) Local Division · UPC-000745

This order concerns a confidentiality dispute in patent infringement proceedings before the Milan Local Division. Ericsson filed an infringement action against ASUSTek and related entities regarding patent EP3076673, and the defendants filed a counterclaim for revocation along with applications under rules 262A and 262.2 RoP to establish a confidentiality regime for certain documents. The court rejected Ericsson's request for an 'external eyes only' confidentiality regime and established a confidentiality club comprising external UPC representatives, licensing expert witnesses, and one natural person from each party.

patent LITIGATION · Apr 28, 2025

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v.ASUSTek Computer Inc., Arvato Netherlands B.V., and Digital River Ireland Ltd.

Milan (IT) Local Division · UPC-000744

This case concerns a patent infringement action filed by Ericsson against ASUS entities regarding patent EP3076673, along with a counterclaim for revocation. The core dispute involved the confidentiality regime to be applied to certain documents, with Ericsson requesting an 'external eyes only' regime while the defendants sought access for at least one natural person from each party. The Court rejected Ericsson's request for an 'external eyes only' regime and established a confidentiality club comprising external UPC representatives, licensing expert witnesses, and one natural person from each party.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →