Judge Profile

Not provided

4 IP cases indexed. Covers patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

4 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent LITIGATION · Jan 22, 2025

Mammoet Holding B.V. v.P.T.S. Machinery B.V.

The Hague (NL) Local Division · UPC-000999

Mammoet Holding B.V., proprietor of European patent EP 4 171 996 B1 concerning a modular trailer system with jack cradles, filed an ex parte application for preserving evidence against P.T.S. Machinery B.V. before the Local Division The Hague. Mammoet alleged that PTS, which had been commissioned in November 2020 to build jack cradles based on confidential drawings, was indirectly infringing the patent by producing and supplying a 'Mechanical Construction' matching the claimed invention. The court granted the application, ordering measures including physical seizure of documentation, access to PTS' premises, appointment of a bailiff and expert, and penalty payments for non-compliance.

patent LITIGATION · Nov 27, 2024

Himson Engineering Private Limited v.Oerlikon Textile GmbH & Co. KG

Milan (IT) Local Division · UPC-001132

Procedural order from the Milan Local Division of the Unified Patent Court rescheduling an Interim Conference in an infringement action concerning European Patent EP2145848. The defendant Himson Engineering Private Limited declared unavailability due to prior professional commitments, and the court rescheduled the conference to the afternoon of the same day and converted it to a video-conference format with the agreement of all parties.

patent LITIGATION · Oct 1, 2024

A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l. v.Insulet Corporation

Milan (IT) Local Division · UPC-001231

This procedural order concerns an application by EOFLOW Co Ltd to intervene under Rule 313 RoP in provisional measures proceedings brought by Insulet Corporation against A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l. concerning alleged infringement of European Patent EP 4201327 relating to a patch-insulin pump. The Milan Local Division dismissed the application to intervene, holding that the balance of interests favored a speedy decision in the interim proceedings, that Eoflow's arguments were already being addressed in parallel proceedings before the Milan Central Division, and that the provisional measures would only affect Eoflow indirectly.

patent LITIGATION · Oct 1, 2024

Insulet Corporation v.A. Menarini Diagnostics s.r.l. (Eoflow Co Ltd Intervention)

Milan (IT) Local Division · UPC-001229

Eoflow Co Ltd applied to intervene in provisional measures proceedings brought by Insulet Corporation against A. Menarini Diagnostics concerning alleged infringement of EP 4201327 (a patch-insulin pump patent). The Milan Local Division dismissed the application to intervene, holding that the efficiency of the interim proceedings and the applicant's interest in a speedy decision outweighed Eoflow's interest in intervening, particularly since Eoflow was already a defendant in parallel infringement proceedings before the Milan Central Division.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →