6 cases · page 1 of 1
Messerle GmbH v.Sabert Corporation Europe S.A.
This case before the Vienna Local Division concerned European Patent EP 3 705 415 B1, directed to packaging for food products comprising a cardboard or paperboard tray and a lid. Messerle GmbH brought an infringement action against Sabert Corporation Europe S.A., which filed a counterclaim for revocation. The Court dismissed both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation, with each party bearing its own costs.
Messerle GmbH v.Sabert Corporation Europe S.A.
This case before the Vienna Local Division concerned European Patent EP 3 705 415 B1, directed to packaging for food products comprising a cardboard or paperboard tray and a lid with cooperating connection and retaining elements. Messerle GmbH brought an infringement action against Sabert Corporation Europe S.A., which counterclaimed for revocation of the patent. The Court dismissed both the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation, with each party bearing its own costs.
SWARCO FUTURIT Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH v.STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH
The Local Chamber Vienna of the Unified Patent Court found that STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH infringed European Patent EP 2 643 717 B1 owned by SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH, which relates to a color- and light-mixing collecting optic for outdoor display panels. The court granted injunctive relief, recall, destruction, and removal from distribution channels, as well as a finding of liability for damages, but rejected the plaintiff's request for publication of the decision. The intervener Chainzone Technology was ordered to bear costs jointly with the defendant.
In re Request by DMV industrijski kontrolni sistemi d.o.o. for Access to Case Files (SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH v.STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH)
DMV industrijski kontrolni sistemi d.o.o., a competitor of the claimant SWARCO Futurit, sought access under Rule 262.1(b) of the Rules of Procedure to the pleadings and evidence in an ongoing patent infringement action concerning European Patent EP 2 643 717. The Local Chamber Vienna denied the request, holding that the protection of the integrity of the ongoing proceedings and the protection of personal data outweighed DMV's asserted information interest, as DMV failed to demonstrate a sufficient legal interest justifying access.
SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme Ges.m.b.H. v.STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH
The Local Chamber Vienna of the Unified Patent Court issued a procedural order regarding an application for intervention by Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd. in a patent infringement action concerning European Patent EP 2 643 717 B1. The court admitted Chainzone's intervention on the defendant's side, subject to the condition that Chainzone deposit security for costs of EUR 134,000 by August 20, 2024, due to the risk of unenforceability of a cost decision in China.
CUP&CINO Kaffeesystem-Vertrieb GmbH & Co. KG v.ALPINA COFFEE SYSTEMS GmbH
Unified Patent Court decision.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.