Settled
at Mannheim (DE) Local Division
5 settled decisions from Mannheim (DE) Local Division.
Settled Decisions
5 cases | Page 1 of 1
NEC Corporation v.Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, Ltd
NEC Corporation successfully withdrew its infringement action against multiple defendants, including Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, Ltd. The court formally closed the proceedings based on the mutual agreement of the represented parties. While the core dispute was settled by withdrawal, the claimant secured a partial reimbursement of court fees (EUR 11,400) under specific UPC Rules of Procedure.
NEC Corporation v.Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, Ltd, et al.
NEC Corporation successfully withdrew its infringement action against Shenzhen Transsion Holdings and several other defendants concerning EP 2 645 714. The court formally closed the proceedings based on the parties' mutual agreement. While the core dispute was settled, the ruling confirmed that all involved parties would bear their own costs, though NEC received a partial reimbursement of its court fees.
Faro Technologies, Inc. v.Blankenhorn GmbH
This UPC Local Chamber decision in Mannheim concerns a cost determination procedure related to EP 4 001 835. The case was resolved not through judicial ruling but because the claimant and respondent reached an out-of-court settlement. Consequently, the court accepted the withdrawal of the request and terminated the costs proceedings.
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v.Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S, Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L, Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Odiporo GmbH, Shamrock Mobile GmbH
This UPC decision in Mannheim concerns the procedural conclusion of a patent infringement and revocation case involving Panasonic Holdings Corporation against various Xiaomi entities. The parties reached an agreement and subsequently withdrew both the infringement claim and the counterclaim for invalidity. Although the core dispute was settled, the court issued detailed rulings on the reimbursement of court fees based on the final determination of the dispute's value.
Panasonic Holdings Corporation v.Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH, Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S, Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L, Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V., Odiporo GmbH, Shamrock Mobile GmbH
This UPC decision from Mannheim concerns a case between Panasonic Holdings Corporation and various Xiaomi entities. The core of the dispute—an infringement claim alongside a revocation counterclaim—was resolved through an agreement, leading both parties to withdraw their respective claims. Although the overall outcome was a settlement, the court issued specific rulings regarding the adjustment of court fees and costs based on the increased value of the dispute.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.