Litigation
at Helsinki (FI) Local Division
6 litigation decisions from Helsinki (FI) Local Division.
Litigation Decisions
6 cases | Page 1 of 1
AIM Sport Development AG v.Supponor Oy and Others
Procedural order from the UPC Local Division Helsinki in an infringement action concerning European Patent EP3295663. AIM Sport Development AG sought leave under Rule 263 RoP to amend its Statement of Claims and under Rule 305 RoP to add a new defendant, TGI Sport Virtual UK Limited. The Court granted the application, allowing the amendments and the addition of the new defendant, while giving the existing defendants three months from the date of the order to lodge their Statement of Defence.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Limited, SASU, España SL, Italia SRL
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy, Supponor Limited, Supponor SASU, Supponor Italia SRL, Supponor España SL
Unified Patent Court decision.
AIM Sport Vision AG v.Supponor Oy
Unified Patent Court decision.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.