Litigation
2 litigation decisions from Copenhagen Local Division.
Litigation Decisions
2 cases | Page 1 of 1
Polytechnik Luft- und Feuerungstechnik GmbH v.Dall Energy ApS
The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court rejected Polytechnik's application for suspensive effect of an order by the Copenhagen Local Division compelling it to produce construction drawings and operation/maintenance manuals in patent infringement proceedings brought by Dall Energy concerning EP 2 334 762. The Court held that Polytechnik failed to demonstrate exceptional circumstances justifying a stay, finding that the confidentiality protections in the order were adequate and that the alleged prejudice did not meet the threshold of a breach of fundamental procedural rights.
Dall Energy ApS v.Polytechnik Luft- und Feuerungstechnik GmbH
This appeal concerned an order for the production of evidence issued by the judge-rapporteur of the Copenhagen Local Division in patent infringement proceedings involving EP 2 334 762, which relates to a method for producing clean hot gas from solid fuel. The Court of Appeal held that while the Court of First Instance did not err in principle in ordering disclosure under Article 59 UPCA and Rule 190 RoP, it exceeded the limits of its discretion by ordering an overly broad scope of disclosure. The order was set aside in part and replaced with a more limited measure confined to construction drawings and operation and maintenance manuals relating to the Polyheld furnace at the Oberpullendorf site.
Facing a similar IP matter?
Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.