Industry Sector

Entertainment — India Trademark Cases

8 decisions indexed

Page 1 of 1 · 8 total

trademark defendant favorable · May 14, 2025

M/S Shri Sai Entertainment Private Limited v.Sukanya Gupta

Delhi District Court · OMP (COMM) 46/24

The petitioner, M/S Shri Sai Entertainment Private Limited, filed a petition to set aside an arbitral award against Mrs. Sukanya Gupta, alleging breach of contract and misuse of intellectual property related to beauty pageants. The petitioner claimed damages for her running a competing pageant shortly after the agreement expired. However, the court dismissed the petition, finding no patent illegality in the arbitrator's findings.

trademark dismissed · Dec 4, 2023

Vrajotsav Goswami v.Devendra Verma

Delhi District Court · CS (Com.) No. 796/2021 & Counter Claim No. 14/2022

Vrajotsav Goswami filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and damages against Devendra Verma, alleging infringement and passing off of his unique singing style name 'Vrajrang' (ब्रजररग), which he claimed to have developed since 1983. The defendant counter-claimed for declaration of prior user rights over the word 'Brajrang'.

trademark defendant favorable · Oct 13, 2017

A.Rajendran v.Thenandal Studios Limited

Madras High Court · O.S.A.No.280 of 2017

The appeal was filed by A.Rajendran against an order dismissing his application for injunction, which sought to restrain respondents from using the title 'Mersal' (an adopted version of 'Merrasalaitan'). The court dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant failed to prove that the subject title had acquired any goodwill or reputation.

trademark settled · Sep 20, 2017

Abp News Network Private Limited & Anr v.Pobi Infrastructure Private Limited & ...

Calcutta High Court · CS 174 of 2017

The Calcutta High Court decreed a suit filed by ABP News Network against Pobi Infrastructure, resolving the dispute through an amicable out-of-court settlement. The defendants acknowledged that the mark "Shera Bangali" is a well-known trademark of the plaintiffs and committed not to use it for their upcoming or future film ventures. This judgment underscores the importance of pre-litigation settlements in IP disputes involving brand reputation.

trademark settled · Apr 1, 2015

M/s.Varsha Productions v.Shivaji Rao Gaikwad

Madras High Court · O.S.A.No.71 of 2015

The appeal arose from an interlocutory order concerning a suit filed by the respondent, Shivaji Rao Gaikwad (Rajinikanth), seeking to restrain M/s.Varsha Productions from using his name, image, or style in their film project 'Main Hoon Rajinikanth'. The parties subsequently reached a settlement.

trademark defendant favorable · Feb 27, 2007

Kanungo Media (P) Ltd. v.Rgv Film Factory And Ors.

Delhi High Court · 138(2007)DLT312

Kanungo Media sought a permanent injunction against Rgv Film Factory for using the title 'Nishabd' for their film, claiming it was deceptively similar to their award-winning film 'Nisshabd'. The plaintiff argued that its prior recognition and association with the name gave it exclusive rights. However, the Delhi High Court dismissed the interim injunction application due to significant delay in approaching the court, noting that the balance of convenience had shifted heavily in favor of the defendant as the film was nearing release.

trademark defendant favorable · Jul 29, 1997

Goel Pocket Books v.Raja Pocket Books

Delhi High Court · null

The respondent, Raja Pocket Books, sought an ad interim injunction against the appellant, Goel Pocket Books, for using the deceptively similar trade mark 'Nagputra' in relation to comics, which infringed upon their established trade mark 'Nagraj'. The court found that there was a likelihood of confusion among consumers, especially children, and dismissed the appeal.

trademark plaintiff favorable · May 16, 1997

Time Warner Entertainment Company v.A.K. Das

Delhi High Court · null

Time Warner Entertainment Company sought a permanent injunction against A.K. Das for conducting television services under the name CBO/CABLE BOX OFFICE, which was deemed deceptively similar to Time Warner's established trade mark HBO/HOME BOX OFFICE. The court confirmed the interim injunction, finding that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →