Trackon Couriers Private Limited v. B N Srinivas

902-IA(L)-35022-2024

The Plaintiff, a courier service company, sought an interim injunction against the Defendant for using marks containing 'TRACK-ON' or 'TRACK-ON EXPRESS', which are confusingly similar to the Plaintiff's registered trademarks. The court found that the Plaintiff had made out a strong prima facie case and granted temporary relief.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Bombay High Court
Case Number
902-IA(L)-35022-2024
Decision Date
22 January 2026

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Bombay High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in Trackon Couriers Private Limited vs B N Srinivas is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademarkC.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 90/2021

A.K. Al Muhaidib And SonsvsChaman Lal Sachdeva And Anr.

The Delhi High Court allowed a petition filed under Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, removing the mark 'AL-WALIMAH' (TM No. 523217) from the register. The petitioner successfully argued that the respondent had failed to demonstrate bona fide use of the trademark in relation to goods in Class 30 for a continuous period of five years. Given the lack of evidence of genuine commercial use, the court ruled in favor of the petitioner, directing the removal of the mark.

trademarkCS (COMM) 437/2020

L'Oreal S.A.vsTarun Sankhla trading as M/s LEORA COSMETICS

L'Oreal S.A. filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against Tarun Sankhla (trading as M/s LEORA COSMETICS) for infringing its trademarks, passing off, and diluting its brand reputation in the cosmetics market. The court found that the defendant was using deceptively similar marks and tradenames, leading to the decreeing of the plaintiff's suit.

trademarkCS (COMM) 230/2020

Krbl LimitedvsAshok Kumar

Krbl Limited filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against defendants for infringing its registered trademark, 'INDIA GATE with device of INDIA GATE', which is used in the business of rice. The court found that Defendant No. 1 was fraudulently using the trademark through an impugned website and domain name, leading to unauthorized sales and collection of money.

trademarkCS (COMM) No. 347 of 2023

Aarogyaai Innovations Private LimitedvsAshok Kumar

The plaintiff, AarogyaAI Innovations Private Limited, holds registered trademarks for 'AarogyaAI', a software that uses AI to analyze genomic data for diagnosing drug-resistant tuberculosis. The plaintiff filed suit alleging that Defendant No. 1 and Defendant No. 2 fraudulently purchased similar domain names (aarogyaai.com and aarogyaai.in), causing potential misrepresentation and trade mark infringement. The court found the defendants liable and decreed the suit.

trademarkCustoms Appeal No.51287 of 2022 (SM)

Indulge Sign And GraphicsvsCommissioner, Customs-New Delhi

The appellant challenged the confiscation and penalty imposed by the Adjudicating Authority on imported LED Module Lights bearing the 'Samsung' brand. The core dispute revolved around whether the goods were counterfeit and if the customs department followed the strict procedural timelines mandated by the IPR Enforcement Rules, 2007.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call