The Institute Of Company Secretaries Of India v. Mangalore Institute Of Fire and Safety Engineering

W.P No.42046/2012 (Edn-Res)

The Institute of Company Secretaries of India (Petitioner) sought to quash a prospectus and direct respondents from imparting an MBA in Company Secretaryship course because they were using the trade mark 'CS', which the Petitioner claimed was protected under Section 15-B of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980. The Court clarified that while respondents could impart similar courses, they must not use the specific trademark 'CS' to save the petitioner's logo and patent.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Karnataka High Court
Case Number
W.P No.42046/2012 (Edn-Res)
Judge(s)
Huluvadi G.Ramesh

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Karnataka High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in The Institute Of Company Secretaries Of India vs Mangalore Institute Of Fire and Safety Engineering is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademarkO.S.A.No.483 of 2018

Ashok Leyland LimitedvsCaptain Tractors Private Limited

Ashok Leyland Limited filed a suit alleging that Captain Tractors Private Limited was using the mark 'CAPTAIN' to pass off its goods. The dispute centered on whether the use of the mark constituted passing off, given that Ashok Leyland manufactures heavy vehicles while the respondent holds a registration for mini tractors.

trademark(T)OP(TM)/420/2023

Centaur Pharmaceuticals Private LimitedvsSai Mirra Innopharm Private Limited; The Registrar of Trade Marks

The Madras High Court dismissed a petition filed by Centaur Pharmaceuticals seeking the rectification or removal of Trade Mark No. 1409666 from the register. The court found that the trade mark's last valid registration expired long ago, specifically on December 28, 2015. Since the renewal period had lapsed and the petition was based on rectifying an active registration, the court held the case to be infructuous.

trademarkOP(TM)No.67 of 2024

Iconic Ip Interests Llc and The Hershey CompanyvsDukes Consumer Care Limited and The Registrar of Trademarks

Iconic IP Interests LLC and The Hershey Company successfully petitioned the Madras High Court for the rectification of a trademark registration, specifically targeting the mark 'TWO MUCH'. The petitioners argued that the respondent's mark had not been used continuously for five years from its date of registration. Given the lack of evidence of use by Dukes Consumer Care Limited, the court allowed the petition and directed the Registrar to remove the impugned entry from the register.

trademarkService Tax Appeal Nos. 40635 and 40636 of 2017

T T Krishnamachari And Co.vsCommissioner of GST and Central Excise

The appellant, T.T. Krishnamachari & Co., challenged demands raised by the Department regarding service tax on royalty income received for allowing group companies to use their registered logo 'TTK'. The dispute centered on whether this usage constituted a taxable Intellectual Property Right (IPR) service or was exempt under copyright law.

trademarkOP(TM) No. 44 of 2025

M/S.Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt.vsM/S.Shri Lakshmi Agro Agencies & The Registrar of Trademarks

The Madras High Court dismissed the rectification petition filed by M/S.Sri Narasu's Coffee Company Pvt. Ltd. against M/S.Shri Lakshmi Agro Agencies. The petitioner had sought to cancel the trademark registration 'Udhaiyam' in Class 30, citing grounds for invalidity. However, both parties subsequently entered into a Memorandum of Compromise and filed an additional joint memo requesting withdrawal. Consequently, the court accepted the request and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call