Pfizer Products Inc. v. Sanjay Rungta T/As M/S Bonsai Pharma

C/RA/247/2022

The Gujarat High Court directed the removal of the trademark 'TERCOREX' from the official registry website. The court noted that the trademark was likely to be removed due to non-filing of a renewal request within the prescribed time limit, citing precedents from other high courts. This order effectively cleared the mark from public record, allowing the petitioner liberty to file again should the mark eventually be renewed.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Gujarat High Court
Case Number
C/RA/247/2022
Judge(s)
Nirzar S. Desai

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Gujarat High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in Pfizer Products Inc. vs Sanjay Rungta T/As M/S Bonsai Pharma is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademark(T) OP (TM) No.540 of 2023

The World Community Services CentrevsVetham Kuzhumam Spiritual Trust

The Madras High Court disposed of a petition filed by The World Community Services Centre seeking rectification of a trademark registration held by Vetham Kuzhumam Spiritual Trust. The dispute, which involved specific service descriptions within Trademark Registration No. 3654426, was resolved amicably through a Joint Memorandum of Compromise signed by both parties. Consequently, the Court directed the Registrar of Trademarks to implement the terms of this compromise.

trademarkCOMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO.573 OF 2019

Hindustan Unilever LimitedvsAhuvan Industries

Hindustan Unilever Limited filed a commercial IP suit against Ahuvan Industries alleging infringement of its copyright in the SUNLIGHT label artwork and passing off through the use of deceptively similar trade dress and label marks by the Defendant's product, MEJOL. The Bombay High Court granted leave to appeal and decreed the suit.

trademarkC.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 228/2023, I.A. 20277/2023, I.A. 20278/2023, I.A. 20279/2023 & I.A. 20280/2023

Dabur India LimitedvsEmami Limited And Anr

The Delhi High Court addressed a petition filed by Dabur India Limited seeking the rectification and removal of a trademark registered in favor of Emami Limited. Despite arguments regarding prior injunctions related to passing off suits, the court ruled that since the rectification application had already been filed, there was no impediment to issuing notice. The court emphasized that rectification proceedings must be decided first before proceeding with the trial of the underlying suit.

trademark13-iaL-30040-24

Bisleri International Private LimitedvsPriti Rajawat, Sole Proprietor Of M/S ...

Bisleri International Private Limited filed an Interim Application seeking further ad-interim relief against Priti Rajawat for alleged infringement of its trademarks (BRISLERI), copyright in its label/packaging, and design/shape. The court noted that previous interim orders were granted but had not been served on the Defendants. Consequently, the court ordered service of the relevant order before hearing and disposing of the current application.

trademarkService Tax Appeal Nos. 41045 to 41051 of 2015

T T Krishnamachari And CovsCommissioner of GST and Central Excise

The Appellant challenged demands raised by the Department regarding non-payment of service tax on royalty charges collected from group companies for using the "TTK" logo. The Department argued that the logo was used as a Trademark, attracting IPR Service Tax. The Appellant contended that the logo was registered as an artistic work under the Copyright Act and thus exempt.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call