K.R. Chinnikrishna Chetty Trading As ... v. K. Venkatesa Mudaliar And K. ...

CMA No. 58 of 1966

The appeal concerned an opposition filed against the registration of the trade mark 'Radha's Sri Andal' for snuff. The respondents argued that this mark was deceptively similar to their well-known marks, 'Sri Ambal Snuff', which they had been using for decades. The court ultimately held that despite the addition of 'Radha', the combination was likely to cause confusion among consumers.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Madras High Court
Case Number
CMA No. 58 of 1966
Decision Date
6 October 1972

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Madras High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in K.R. Chinnikrishna Chetty Trading As ... vs K. Venkatesa Mudaliar And K. ... is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademarkCommercial IP Suit (L) No.204 of 2019 / Notice of Motion (L) No.454 of 2019

Metro Brands Ltd.vsMetro Footwear

The Plaintiff filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging that the Defendant was infringing its registered trademark 'METRO' and engaging in passing off. The Court found prima facie satisfaction regarding the infringement and granted ad-interim relief.

trademarkC/RA/112/2022

Make Up Art Cosmetics Inc.vsPankaj Laljibhai Kachadia & Anr.

The Gujarat High Court addressed a rectification application concerning the trademark 'MAKSHINE,' which was flagged as likely to be removed due to non-renewal. Citing precedents from other high courts, the court directed the Registrar of Trademarks to remove the mark from its official website. This order allowed the petitioner to file a fresh petition should the trademark eventually be renewed, effectively resolving the immediate issue while preserving future rights.

trademark(T)CMA(GI)No.2 of 2023

Ramesh Chandra SahoovsWest Bengal State Food Processing and Horticulture Development Corporation Limited

The appeal challenged an order that treated a Geographical Indication (GI) rectification application as abandoned due to procedural delays. The appellant argued that he had taken steps within the permissible time limits, including obtaining extensions under the GI Act. The High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration.

trademarkTMA/6/2022 IA NO: GA/1/2022

Elite Gold LtdvsThe Asst Registrar Of Trade

The Calcutta High Court overturned an earlier decision that had expunged seven registered trademarks of 'KOPIKO' due to alleged lack of evidence of use. The appellant, Elite Gold Ltd, argued that they were a well-known international proprietor using their products through distributors. Recognizing the need for further evidence, the court set aside the rectification order and remanded the matter back to the Controller for a fresh hearing, allowing the appellant to adduce additional documents.

trademarkOP(TM) No. 45 of 2025

Sri Narasu'S Coffee Company Pvt.LtdvsS.Sudhakar

The Madras High Court dismissed the trademark rectification petition filed by Sri Narasu's Coffee Company Pvt.Ltd against S.Sudhakar and others. The dismissal was not a ruling on the merits but rather an acceptance of a Memorandum of Compromise signed between the parties. This settlement effectively resolved the dispute regarding the 'Udhaiyam' trademark registration in Class 30.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call