Silvermaple Healthcare Services Private Limited v. Desai Hospitals Ventures LLP & Ors.

CS(COMM) 1076/2025

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of Silvermaple Healthcare Services against Desai Hospitals Ventures LLP and others regarding alleged infringement of trademarks and copyrights related to hair restoration services. The court found that the Plaintiff was likely to suffer irreparable harm if the Defendants continued using the protected marks and copyrighted materials, leading to a favorable order for the Plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court - Orders
Case Number
CS(COMM) 1076/2025
Decision Date
3 November 2025

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before Delhi High Court - Orders. Understanding the court's reasoning in Silvermaple Healthcare Services Private Limited vs Desai Hospitals Ventures LLP & Ors. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patentCS(OS) 328/2006 & CS(OS) 1352/2006 (IA 1941/2006 & IA 7308/2006)

M/S Koxan India / Ramesh MardiavsRamesh Mardia / M/S Koxan India

The Delhi High Court dismissed two separate applications seeking ad interim injunctions regarding the use of the trademark 'MARDIA CABLES.' The core dispute centered on conflicting claims of exclusive rights over the mark, stemming from a chain of assignments and subsequent re-assignments. Given the complex factual matrix—including disputed assignment documents and competing registrations—the court found that neither party could establish a clear prima facie case for exclusivity at this preliminary stage.

patentCOMAPL-6617-2025 with APP-66-2012-FC

UTO Nederland B.V.vsTilaknagar Industries Ltd.

The Bombay High Court addressed complex trademark disputes involving UTO Nederland B.V. and Tilaknagar Industries Ltd., concerning the use of marks 'MANSION HOUSE' and 'SAVOY CLUB'. The court upheld an earlier order dismissing UTO’s attempt to stop passing off, while simultaneously setting aside interim orders that had allowed certain product introductions by Tilaknagar. Crucially, the judgment mandates maintaining the current status quo regarding these marks until the main suit is finally decided, emphasizing the need for expedited trial proceedings.

patentC.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 62/2022

M/S Malabar Gold Private LimitedvsMr. M. Manuvel And Anr.

The Delhi High Court addressed interim applications in the trademark dispute between Malabar Gold Private Limited and Mr. M. Manuvel. The defendant argued that the existing injunction should be vacated because the plaintiff failed to disclose specific conditions imposed by the Trade Marks Registry regarding their trademarks, particularly concerning the exclusive right over 'M' or 'MALABAR'. The court accepted submissions from both parties and scheduled the matter for further hearing.

patentCS(COMM) 699/2023

Intervet International B.V.vsReyaansh Healthcare

The plaintiffs, holders of Indian Patent 283279 for the veterinary product Fluralaner, filed a suit against Reyaansh Healthcare for manufacturing and selling Fluralaner tablets under the brand Flurashield without a license. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from manufacturing or selling the product until further hearing.

patentCS(COMM) 823/2018

Merck Sharp & Dohme LlcvsSanjeev Gupta & Ors

The commercial suit for patent infringement (CS(COMM) 823/2018) between Merck Sharp & Dohme Llc and Sanjeev Gupta & Ors was settled. The parties agreed that the suit would be decreed in favor of the Plaintiffs, acknowledging the validity of Patent IN'816 and the Defendants' infringing activities.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call