Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs

(T)CMA(PT)/96 /2023

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (Patents) seeking to set aside an impugned order and grant a patent on Indian Patent Application No. 5162/CHENP/2010. The appellant subsequently instructed counsel to withdraw the appeal.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Madras High Court
Case Number
(T)CMA(PT)/96 /2023
Decision Date
13 July 2023

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before Madras High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. vs The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patent(T)CMA(PT)/183/2023 (OA/SR.59/2019/PT/CHN)

M/s. Honda Motor Co., LtdvsM/s. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs, Government of India

M/s. Honda Motor Co., Ltd filed a Transfer Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (Patents) challenging the refusal order issued by the Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs on March 27, 2019. However, the appellant subsequently instructed its counsel to withdraw the appeal.

patentC.S.No.724 of 2013

M/s.Aachi Masala Foods (P) Ltd.vsHOTEL NAMMA AACHI

The Madras High Court ruled in favor of M/s. Aachi Masala Foods (P) Ltd., finding that the defendant's use of 'HOTEL NAMMA AACHI' constituted both trademark infringement and passing off. The court determined that the defendant adopted a name visually and phonetically similar to the plaintiff's well-known mark, AACHI, with malicious intent to capitalize on the plaintiff's goodwill. Consequently, the suit was decreed, granting permanent injunctions and awarding costs to the plaintiffs.

patentC.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 22/2022

Societe Des Produits Nestle SavsThe Controller Of Patents And Design & Anr.

Nestle appealed a rejection order issued by the Controller of Patents and Design regarding its patent application for a composition comprising DGLA. The initial objection was related to Section 3(i) of the Patents Act, 1970, which Nestle addressed by amending the claims. However, the subsequent amendment was rejected under Section 59 on grounds of expanding the original claim scope.

patentC.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 39/2022

V-Guard Industries Ltd.vsThe Registrar of Trademarks and Livguard Energy Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

The Delhi High Court issued an order in V-Guard Industries Ltd. vs The Registrar of Trademarks and Livguard Energy Technologies Pvt. Ltd., directing that the present appeal be listed along with another case for a final hearing on January 6, 2023. This interim order manages the procedural timeline of the ongoing trademark dispute between the parties.

patentC.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 160/2022

Vending Updates (India) Private LimitedvsRegistrar Of Trademarks

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal filed by Vending Updates (India) Private Limited against the refusal of its device mark registration. The initial objection, based on similarity to Amazon's registered trademark, was overcome when Amazon Technologies, Inc. provided a Letter of Consent. Consequently, the court quashed the rejection order and directed the application to proceed towards publication and registration.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call