Conopco Inc. v. Banwari Lal (M/s Cosmic Chemicals c/o M/s Atul Trading Co.)

Dr. Jitendra Das MagantivsMGM Healthcare Pvt. Ltd.

Dr. Jitendra Das Maganti filed three Original Applications seeking an interim injunction against MGM Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., alleging trademark infringement and passing off related to the 'SEVEN HILLS' brand, which is registered by the plaintiff. The dispute arose in the context of a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) where the corporate debtor was undergoing restructuring. The Madras High Court ultimately dismissed the applications, finding that the resolution plan sanctioned by the NCLT prima facie granted permission to use 'Seven Hills,' thus balancing convenience in favor of the defendant.

Prem N. Mayor And Ors.vsRegistrar Of Trade Marks And Ors.

This Calcutta High Court judgment addresses an appeal challenging the refusal of a trade mark registration. The appellant, holding the 'Lion Brand,' opposed the registration of 'Ma Durga Brand.' The court ultimately upheld the rejection, finding that despite both marks featuring a lion, the overall visual and conceptual differences—particularly the dominance of the goddess figure in the respondent's mark—prevented a likelihood of confusion or deception under Section 12(1) of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC.vsThe Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs

Microsoft Technology Licensing appealed the dismissal of its patent application (No. 4866/CHENP/2015) by the Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs. The rejection was based on alleged non-filing of Form-3, coverage by the original application, and exceeding the specification. The High Court allowed the appeal, finding that the Controller had not applied its mind to the facts, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

Gurcharan SinghvsThe Controller Of Patents

Gurcharan Singh filed an appeal challenging the Controller of Patents' order which dismissed his Review Petition. The initial application for condonation of 150 days delay was allowed by the High Court, and the main appeal was listed for further proceedings.

Ab Initio Technology LlcvsAssistant Controller Of Patents And Designs / The Controller of Patents

Ab Initio Technology Llc challenged the rejection of its patent applications, which were initially denied on grounds that the subject matter was merely a computer program per se or algorithm (Section 3(k)). The appellant argued that their data processing method provided a 'technical effect' by improving resource efficiency. The Delhi High Court allowed the appeals to the extent that the objections under Section 3(k) and Section 16(1) were found not tenable, setting aside those impugned orders. However, the court remanded the matter back to the Controller for fresh examination regarding inventive step (Section 2(1)(ja)).