Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh & Anr v. Mn Reddy & Anr

CS(COMM) 494/2017

The dispute involved allegations of patent infringement concerning the drug RIVAROXABAN (Patent No. 211300). The parties reached a settlement, leading to a decree in favour of the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court - Orders
Case Number
CS(COMM) 494/2017
Judge(s)
Jayant Nath

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in patent matters before Delhi High Court - Orders. Understanding the court's reasoning in Bayer Intellectual Property Gmbh & Anr vs Mn Reddy & Anr is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

patent(T)OP(PT)38/2023

Lakshmi Ring Travellers (Coimbatore) LimitedvsBracker Ag

Lakshmi Ring Travellers filed a petition seeking the revocation of Patent No. 212183 held by Bracker Ag. The court noted that the term of the impugned patent had already ended on March 26, 2015.

patentCS(COMM) 1322/2025

Salman KhanvsAshok Kumar/John Doe & Ors.

The Delhi High Court registered the suit filed by actor Salman Khan against various defendants for alleged misappropriation of personality rights, trademark infringement, copyright violation, and passing off. The court granted several procedural reliefs to the Plaintiff, including exemption from mandatory pre-institution mediation due to the urgent nature of the matter. Furthermore, the court issued directions for service on identified infringing parties and set a timeline for filing written statements and replication, while also considering an application for ad-interim injunction.

patentW.P.(C)-IPD 15/2025

Ciena CorporationvsUnion Of India & Ors.

Ciena Corporation challenged the deemed abandonment of its Indian patent application, which was issued by the Patent Office due to failure to respond to a First Examination Report (FER). The petitioner argued that this lapse was solely attributable to an inadvertent mistake made by their patent agent. The Delhi High Court agreed with Ciena, holding that an applicant should not suffer consequences for the bona fide errors of their legal representatives or agents. Consequently, the court set aside the abandonment letter and restored the application, granting a final opportunity to prosecute the patent.

patentC.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 86/2024, I.A. 32967/2024-Stay; C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 91/2024, I.A. 33317/2024-Stay

Ms Allanasons Private LimitedvsThe Registrar Of Trademarks & Anr.

The Delhi High Court issued an order in the matter concerning Ms Allanasons Private Limited versus The Registrar Of Trademarks & Anr. This interim order scheduled both associated commercial IP disputes (C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 86/2024 and C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 91/2024) for a hearing on August 29, 2025. The court's directive indicates the ongoing procedural progression of these trademark matters.

patentCS(COMM) 1363/2025

Kenvue Brands Llc & AnrvsRspl Limited

Plaintiffs filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against infringement of their patent (IN 339964) by Defendant's products. The court, while considering an application for interim injunction, raised serious doubts regarding the authenticity and timing of the technical expert affidavit provided by the Plaintiffs.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Dealing with a patent challenge?

Whether it's a Section 3(d) rejection, a post-grant opposition, or a FRAND dispute, Arctic's patent litigation team has handled it. Get a strategy call.

Talk to our patent team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar patent matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call