Judge Profile

T.Raja

8 IP cases indexed. Covers patent, copyright matters.

Cases Presided Over

8 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent plaintiff favorable · Mar 14, 2023

Mr.C.S.Padam Chand v.K.Shibu Proprietor Thameem Films and M/s H.R.Pictures

Madras High Court · O.S.A.(CAD)No.18 of 2023

The appeal concerned the appellant's attempt to restrain the release of the movie 'Thugs' due to alleged non-fulfillment of obligations under prior copyright agreements with K.Shibu. The court found that although H.R.Pictures was not a party to the original agreement, an interim injunction could be maintained against its further exploitation (OTT rights) provided K.Shibu furnished adequate security.

patent defendant favorable · Jan 20, 2023

P.Ponnuchamy v.M/s.UTV Motion Pictures

Madras High Court · O.S.A.No.131 of 2020

This appeal challenged an order that disallowed the plaintiff from amending his plaint to include claims for royalty and account of profits related to the movie 'Thandavam'. The court dismissed the appeal, finding merit in the respondent's argument regarding the significant delay (nine years) in seeking these amendments. The judgment emphasized that courts must consider all facts and circumstances when exercising discretion on amendment applications.

patent defendant favorable · Jan 6, 2023

The Managing Director and Appellate Authority, Tasmac v.M.Loganathan

Madras High Court · W.A.No.46 of 2023

Tasmac appealed an interim order from the Single Judge, which directed them to provide certain commercially sensitive information regarding liquor purchasing rates in a sealed cover. Tasmac argued that this information constituted trade secrets protected under Section 8(1)(d) of the RTI Act, 2005. The High Court dismissed the appeal.

patent plaintiff favorable · Sep 16, 2019

Sri Narasu's Coffee Company Ltd v.Narasu's Sarathy Industries

Madras High Court · C.M.A.No.2470 of 2016

The Madras High Court allowed an appeal filed by Sri Narasu's Coffee Company Ltd against a lower court order. The company successfully argued that it is the exclusive owner of the 'Narasu's' trade mark, dating back to 1926. Given the risk of irreparable injury and loss of goodwill due to the respondents granting licenses to third parties, the Court issued an interim injunction. This order mandates that the respondents cease all licensing or assignment activities related to the trademark until the final disposal of the civil suits.

patent dismissed · Dec 20, 2018

Snj Distillers Private Limited v.The Deputy Registrar Of Trademarks

Madras High Court · W.P.No.11126 of 2016

Snj Distillers Private Limited filed a writ petition seeking a Writ of Mandamus to compel the Deputy Registrar of Trademarks to issue a registration certificate for their trademark application. However, during the proceedings, the petitioner's counsel informed the court that the trademark certificate had already been issued. Consequently, the Madras High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.

patent defendant favorable · Apr 28, 2018

M/S.Sew-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. Kg v.The Registrar, Trademarks Registry

Madras High Court · W.P.Nos.11172 & 11316 of 2018

The Madras High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by M/S.Sew-Eurodrive Gmbh & Co. Kg challenging the Registrar's decision to treat its trademark applications as abandoned. The court held that since the impugned orders were passed by the Trademark Registrar, the appropriate remedy for the petitioner was not a Writ Petition under Article 226, but rather an appeal before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB).

patent plaintiff favorable · Mar 28, 2014

NTT DoCoMo Inc. v.The Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, The Patent Office; The Controller of Patents, The Patent Office; The Union of India

Madras High Court · W.P.No.6594 of 2013

NTT DoCoMo Inc. challenged the refusal by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs to revive its Patent Application No.4851/CHENP/2007. The application was mistakenly withdrawn due to a clerical error committed by the petitioner's erstwhile patent attorneys, who interchanged the numbers of two related applications. The court allowed the petition, holding that the petitioner was an innocent party and should not suffer injustice.

copyright defendant favorable · Feb 16, 2010

K.S.Gita v.Vision Time India Pvt. Ltd.

Madras High Court · OSA.Nos.38 to 41 of 2010

K.S.Gita, claiming ownership of the copyright in the literary work 'THANGAM/BANGARAM/GANGA', filed appeals against orders dismissing her applications for temporary injunctions and royalty payments regarding the teleserial 'THANGAM'. The court examined the claims of infringement and financial reliefs sought by the plaintiff.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →