Judge Profile

Ranjan Gogoi

4 IP cases indexed. Covers trademark, patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

4 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

trademark defendant favorable · Dec 14, 2017

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v.M/S Prius Auto Industries Limited & Ors.

Supreme Court - Daily Orders · Civil Appeal Nos. 5375-5377 of 2017

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha filed a suit seeking permanent injunctions against M/S Prius Auto Industries Limited for infringement of its trademarks ('TOYOTA', 'TOYOTA INNOVA', 'TOYOTA DEVICE') and passing off using the mark 'Prius'. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's order, finding that Toyota failed to establish sufficient goodwill or market reputation for 'Prius' in India.

patent defendant favorable · Dec 14, 2017

Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd. v.Kamat Hotels (India) Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · Special Leave Petition (C) No.6131 of 2015

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by Royal Orchid Hotels Ltd. concerning its trademark registration in Class 42 against Kamat Hotels (India) Ltd. The dispute centered on who was the prior user of the 'Royal Orchid' mark. Despite arguments regarding previous litigation, the Court found that the High Court's detailed consideration of evidence—which concluded that the petitioner had not demonstrated first use and that confusion was possible due to similarity—was reasonable and justified. Consequently, the Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision.

trademark defendant favorable · Dec 14, 2017

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha v.M/S Prius Auto Industries Limited & Ors.

Supreme Court of India · Civil Appeal No. 5375-5377 of 2017

Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and damages against M/S Prius Auto Industries Limited for infringement of its trade marks ('TOYOTA', 'TOYOTA INNOVA', etc.) and passing off using the mark 'Prius'. The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court's order, concluding that Toyota failed to establish sufficient goodwill or reputation for 'Prius' in the Indian market.

patent pending · Jan 27, 2016

Cipla Limited v.F. Hoffman La Roche Limited

Supreme Court - Daily Orders · 1677-1678/2016

Cipla Limited appealed against a final judgment passed by the Delhi High Court. The Supreme Court heard the matter and directed that the case be fixed for final disposal on March 16, 2016. The court also clarified that while existing interim proceedings would continue, no final orders could be passed without its leave.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →