Judge Profile

M.Sathyanarayanan

11 IP cases indexed. Covers trademark, patent, copyright matters.

Cases Presided Over

11 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

trademark defendant favorable · Jan 31, 2019

Rubinetterie Bresciane Bonomi Spa v.M/S.Lehry Instrumentation & Valves Pvt. Ltd.

Madras High Court · OSA.No.252 of 2018

This case involves an Italian company, Rubinetterie Bresciane Bonomi Spa, which filed a suit against M/S.Lehry Instrumentation & Valves Pvt. Ltd. for passing off its trademark and design mark used on brass ball valves. The dispute escalated when the appellant challenged procedural orders passed during the trial process. The Madras High Court ultimately dismissed the appeal, holding that the impugned interlocutory orders did not qualify as 'judgments' under the Letters Patent, thereby rendering the appeals non-maintainable despite the provisions of the Commercial Courts Act.

trademark plaintiff favorable · Nov 2, 2018

Netsweeper Technologies Private Limited v.Netsweeper Inc.

Madras High Court · OSA.No.429/2018

Netsweeper Technologies Private Limited filed a suit against Netsweeper Inc. alleging passing off and unauthorized use of its registered trademark, 'NETSWEEPER'. The plaintiff, based in Canada, claimed that the defendants were wrongfully associating themselves with its brand to sell similar software services. The Madras High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants, confirming the original injunction granted in favor of Netsweeper Technologies Private Limited.

patent settled · Aug 21, 2018

B.Vivekananthan v.B.Anandan Trading as Anand's MOONRAKERS RESTAURANT & B.Anandan Trading as Anand's Moonrakers

Madras High Court · C.S.No.646 of 2014

This Madras High Court case involved a trademark infringement suit filed by B.Vivekananthan against B.Anandan regarding the use of the 'MOONRAKERS' mark in restaurant and hospitality services. The plaintiff sought permanent injunctions for both trademark infringement and passing off, along with delivery up of infringing materials. Ultimately, the parties reached a joint compromise memo on April 30, 2021, which was recorded by the court, leading to a decree based on mutual settlement.

patent plaintiff favorable · Jun 2, 2016

M/s.Advaith Bio Remedies v.The Registrar Of Trademarks

Madras High Court · W.P.No.15534 of 2016

M/s. Advaith Bio Remedies approached the Madras High Court seeking intervention regarding the undue delay in processing their trademark application for 'BIO CARE' (Application No. 3040849). The petitioner, which manufactures Ayurvedic medicines, argued that the prolonged wait was negatively impacting their business operations. The court intervened by issuing a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Registrar of Trademarks to prioritize and dispose of the pending application as expeditiously as possible.

patent dismissed · Mar 28, 2016

M/s.TVS Motor Company Limited v.M/S.Bajaj Auto Limited

Madras High Court · A.No.2647/2015 and A.No.4539/2015 in C.S.No.979 of 2007

The applications were filed by Bajaj Auto Limited (the defendant) seeking to eschew various documents marked as exhibits in a suit where TVS Motor Company Limited (the plaintiff) claimed non-infringement of Patent No. 195904. The court held that most objections regarding document admissibility could be deferred until the time of final arguments, except for specific objections concerning photocopies and newspaper clippings.

patent plaintiff favorable · Jun 9, 2015

M/s.Simco Thread Mills v.The Controller General of Patents, Trademarks, Geographical Indications, Designs

Madras High Court · W.P.No.16155 of 2015

The Madras High Court addressed a writ petition filed by M/s.Simco Thread Mills regarding the delay in processing its application for a change of constitution related to its registered trademark, SIMCO (label). The court directed the relevant Trademark Registry officials to process Forms TM-24, TM-33, and TM-34 pertaining to the trademark expeditiously, ensuring compliance with legal procedures. This ruling provides relief by mandating timely administrative action from the IP authorities.

patent plaintiff favorable · Nov 6, 2014

Fdc Ltd. v.Union Of India

Madras High Court · Writ Petition No. 17241 of 2014

FDC Ltd. challenged an order passed by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) which had set aside the Assistant Controller's initial ruling against the petitioner regarding the revocation of Indian Patent No.197822. The core dispute centered on whether IPAB should have decided the merits or remanded the matter, and specifically, whether directing a fresh Opposition Board was legally sound.

patent settled · Oct 10, 2014

M/S.Grp Dairy Food Pvt. Ltd. v.S.Sudhakar

Madras High Court · W.P.Nos.12963 and 12964 of 2014

The Madras High Court resolved a dispute between M/S.Grp Dairy Food Pvt. Ltd. and S.Sudhakar concerning the trademarks 'Udhayam' and 'GRB Udhayam'. The parties reached an amicable settlement through mediation, resulting in a Memorandum of Compromise. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petitions by allowing the trademark registrations to continue, provided certain conditions outlined in the compromise are incorporated into the registry.

copyright defendant favorable · Apr 27, 2010

M/s Jak Communications Pvt. Ltd. v.M/s Sun Tv Network Limited

Madras High Court · O.S.A.Nos.425 to 428 of 2009

The appeal concerned whether a civil court had jurisdiction to handle disputes related to copyright infringement and piracy of television signals, given the provisions of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants illegally pirated and distributed their channel signals outside the scope of settlement agreements. The High Court ultimately dismissed the appeals.

patent defendant favorable · Mar 12, 2010

M/S. N.Ranga Rao & Sons v.Koya'S Perfumery Works

Madras High Court · O.S.A.No.449 of 2009

The appellant, a leading manufacturer of agarbathies, filed a suit claiming infringement of their registered trade mark 'WOODS' and copyrighted artistic work. The appeal challenged an order directing the respondent to change its trade mark usage. The court dismissed the appeal, finding that 'WOOD' is a publici juris ingredient for agarpathies, and noting differences in color scheme and font between the products.

patent mixed · Jun 30, 2008

Mariappan v.A.R.Safiullah

Madras High Court · O.S.A.NOS.263 AND 283 OF 2006

This Madras High Court judgment addressed appeals concerning alleged infringement and passing off related to food-grade laminated paper resembling banana leaves. The plaintiff, Mariappan, claimed exclusive rights under Patent No. 198079 and a registered design. The court sustained the interim injunction favoring Mariappan, recognizing his established goodwill and potential irreparable loss. However, it noted that the concept was prima facie innovative rather than an invention, confirming the earlier order against A.R.Safiullah.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →