Judge Profile

M. Jagannadha Rao

3 IP cases indexed. Covers patent, trademark, design matters.

Cases Presided Over

3 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent defendant favorable · Mar 8, 1996

Franz Xaver Huemer v.New Yash Engineers

Delhi High Court · AIR1997DELHI79

This Delhi High Court judgment addressed the critical issue of whether a foreign patent holder, who had not commercially exploited their registered patents in India for many years, could successfully seek temporary injunctions against alleged infringers. The plaintiff, Franz Xaver Huemer, sought to restrain New Yash Engineers from manufacturing and selling infringing textile machinery. However, the court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a strong prima facie case or demonstrate that the balance of convenience favored his claim, leading to the dismissal of his appeal.

trademark defendant favorable · Feb 15, 1996

Kellogg Company v.Pravin Kumar Bhadabhai And Another

Delhi High Court · Suit 432/94 (Appeal against IA 2094/94)

Kellogg Company appealed a single judge's order that refused to grant a temporary injunction against Pravin Kumar Bhadabhai and another. The dispute centered on the respondent using a corn flakes carton similar in size and design (trade dress) to Kellogg's, leading to allegations of consumer confusion. The High Court ultimately dismissed the appeal, finding that the prominent difference between 'Kellogg's' and 'AIMS ARISTO' made any likelihood of confusion negligible.

design defendant favorable · Jan 5, 1996

Sardar Jaswant Singh v.M/S. Daya Industries And Another

Delhi High Court · Civil original petition No. 3/1981 (Appeal against dismissal of IA 1188/91)

Sardar Jaswant Singh appealed against the dismissal of his application (IA 1188/91) filed to set aside an earlier order where the design registration was cancelled by M/s. Daya Industries. The cancellation petition argued that the design for heat convectors was not new or original and had prior publication. The High Court ultimately dismissed the appeal, finding that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for his prolonged absence.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →