Judge Profile

Gauri Godse

7 IP cases indexed. Covers trademark, patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

7 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

trademark defendant favorable · Oct 19, 2022

Ultratech Cement Limited v.Bharat Infracement Limited And 6 Ors

Bombay High Court · 904-comapl-33272-2022-with-ial-33275-2022

Ultratech Cement Limited filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging trademark infringement and passing off against Bharat Infracement Ltd & Ors. The appeal challenged an interim order that granted ad-interim reliefs, including the appointment of a Court Receiver to attach properties and seize infringing materials. The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal but awarded costs to Ultratech.

trademark defendant favorable · Oct 19, 2022

Ultratech Cement Limited v.Bharat Infracement Limited And 6 Ors

Bombay High Court · 904-comapl-33272-2022-with-ial-33275-2022

Ultratech Cement Limited filed a Commercial IP Suit alleging trademark infringement and passing off against Bharat Infracement Ltd & Ors. The appeal challenged an interim order that granted ad-interim reliefs, including the appointment of a Court Receiver to attach properties and seize infringing materials. The High Court dismissed the appeal but awarded costs to Ultratech.

patent mixed · Oct 7, 2022

Kewal Ashokbhai Vasoya And Another v.Suarabhakti Goods Pvt Ltd

Bombay High Court · 907-oscomapl-31992-2022

This Commercial Appeal before the Bombay High Court addressed challenges raised by the original defendants against a time-limited, ad-interim injunction and court receiver appointed by the plaintiff. The suit itself was a trademark infringement action combined with passing off. The bench focused primarily on clarifying legal principles regarding applications made without notice to the opposing party.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 6, 2022

Paras Ayurvedic Pharma Pvt.Ltd v.Salman Iqbal Ahmed Momin And Anr

Bombay High Court · 28-COMAPL-21303-2022

Paras Ayurvedic Pharma Pvt.Ltd appealed against two lower court orders concerning a commercial IP suit alleging copyright infringement and passing off related to 'Roghan Sukoon Massage Oil'. The core dispute centered on whether the defendant's product copied the plaintiff's unique artistic work and brand elements, and whether the plaintiffs had sufficient knowledge of the alleged infringement. The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower court's decision that the plaintiffs were entitled to relief.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 6, 2022

Paras Ayurvedic Pharma Pvt Ltd v.Salman Iqbal Ahmed Momin And Anr

Bombay High Court · 28-COMAPL-21303-2022

This commercial appeal involved a dispute over the use of an artistic design on a medicinal oil, 'Roghan Sukoon Massage Oil.' The plaintiff claimed copyright infringement and passing off against the defendant. The core issue revolved around whether the defendant's similar artwork constituted blatant copying and if the plaintiffs had sufficient knowledge to pursue legal action promptly. The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the lower court's decision that the defendant did not infringe upon the plaintiffs' rights.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 6, 2022

Paras Ayurvedic Pharma Pvt.Ltd v.Salman Iqbal Ahmed Momin And Anr

Bombay High Court · 28-COMAPL-21303-2022

This commercial appeal involved a dispute over the medicinal oil 'Roghan Sukoon Massage Oil,' where the Plaintiff alleged copyright infringement and passing off against the Respondent. The core issue revolved around whether the Plaintiffs had sufficient knowledge of the Defendant's impugned goods, which was central to the initial injunction granted by the lower court. The Bombay High Court upheld the previous orders, finding no infirmity in the single judges' discretion regarding the interlocutory applications.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 6, 2022

Paras Ayurvedic Pharma Pvt.Ltd v.Salman Iqbal Ahmed Momin And Anr

Bombay High Court · 28-COMAPL-21303-2022

This commercial appeal involved a dispute over the medicinal oil 'Roghan Sukoon Massage Oil,' where Paras Ayurvedic Pharma Pvt.Ltd alleged copyright infringement and passing off against Salman Iqbal Ahmed Momin and Anr. The core issue revolved around whether the Plaintiffs had knowledge of the Defendant's allegedly infringing goods earlier than they claimed in their plaint. The Bombay High Court upheld the lower court's decision, finding no evidence to suggest that the Plaintiffs were misled or delayed in seeking relief.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →