Judge Profile

Biswanath Somadder

4 IP cases indexed. Covers design, copyright matters.

Cases Presided Over

4 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

design plaintiff favorable · Apr 29, 2015

M/S.Devans Modern Breweries Ltd. v.Controller Of Patents And Designs And Ors.

Calcutta High Court · AID 1 OF 2013

The appellant challenged the refusal of design registration (Application No. 233798) by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs, Kolkata. The High Court found that the Assistant Controller overlooked previous judicial observations regarding consistent application of registration parameters and incorrectly assessed the originality of the bottle design.

design remanded · Nov 26, 2014

Siemens Aktiengesellschaft v.The Controller General Of Patents, Designs and Trademarks & Anr.

Calcutta High Court · AID No.8 of 2013

Siemens Aktiengesellschaft appealed against an order passed by the Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs. The court found that the authority rendered the decision without granting the petitioner's representative a proper opportunity to clarify objections, despite the petitioner having requested accommodation for his absence. Consequently, the impugned decision was set aside and the matter was remanded for a de novo hearing.

design remanded · Aug 20, 2014

Mr. Gigaram M.Patel v.The Assistant Controller Of Patents & Designs & Anr.

Calcutta High Court · AID 5/2012

Mr. Gigaram M.Patel appealed a decision by the Assistant Controller of Patents & Designs regarding the cancellation of a registered design (No. 225589). The High Court set aside the original order, finding that the petitioner was not given adequate opportunity to produce the complete set of Yellow Pages necessary to establish the date of publication.

copyright plaintiff favorable · Sep 26, 2008

Radio Today Broadcasting Ltd. v.Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd.

Calcutta High Court · A.P.O. No. 109 of 2006, C.S. No. 90 of 2006

RTB challenged IPRS's claim that it held exclusive rights to grant licenses and demand payment for the broadcast of sound recordings. RTB argued that its business was being threatened by IPRS, which claimed copyright over underlying works. The court ultimately granted a quia timet injunction restraining IPRS from initiating proceedings against RTB.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →