Judge Profile

Bench:Kailash Gambhir

3 IP cases indexed. Covers patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

3 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent mixed · Apr 4, 2014

Krbl Ltd. v.Pk Overseas Pvt Ltd

Delhi High Court · FAO 532/2011 & C.Ms.22380/11, 29217/15, 29058/16

The Delhi High Court overturned a lower court's decision regarding an application for interim injunction in a passing off dispute concerning rice brands. The appeal focused on the deceptive similarity of color combinations, not just the marks themselves. The High Court found that the trial court failed to adequately address the crucial elements of reputation and consumer confusion before dismissing the injunction request. Consequently, the case was remanded back to the trial court for a fresh hearing after both parties submit necessary documentation.

patent defendant favorable · Mar 15, 2012

M/S Fastrack Communications Pvt. Ltd. v.Manish Singhal

Delhi High Court · CS(OS) 2484/2010

The Delhi High Court dismissed a trademark infringement suit filed by Fastrack Communications against Manish Singhal regarding the use of the mark 'LEMON'. Although the plaintiff argued for an injunction based on prior usage and apprehension of passing off (a qua timet action), the court noted that the defendant had categorically stated he would not launch or use the trademark until his own registration application was decided. Given this stand, the court found no further basis to sustain the suit, despite acknowledging the plaintiff's right to file such an action.

patent defendant favorable · Dec 24, 2010

M/S. H.T. Media Ltd. v.Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Delhi High Court · W.P.(C) 19941/2005

M/S. H.T. Media Ltd. challenged the Municipal Corporation of Delhi's (MCD) prohibition against displaying its trade name on public boards in front of housing societies, arguing it was merely informational and not an advertisement. The MCD contended that this display served a commercial purpose to promote the petitioner's brand. The High Court ultimately ruled that since the display aimed to promote and publicize the newspaper 'Hindustan Times', it constituted 'advertisement' under the DMC Act, leading to the dismissal of the petition.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →