Judge Profile

Bench:K.R.Shriram

13 IP cases indexed. Covers patent, trademark matters.

Cases Presided Over

13 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent plaintiff favorable · Jul 6, 2021

Control Print Limited v.Anmol Chugh Trading As Shavias Enterprises and Ors.

Bombay High Court · 19.IAL-13637-2021 (in Commercial IP Suit No. 13634 of 2021)

In a mixed IP dispute involving copyright infringement and passing off related to 'The Mask Lab,' the Bombay High Court granted ad-interim relief in favor of Control Print Limited. The court issued injunctions restraining the defendants from using designs substantially similar to the plaintiff's copyrighted artistic work, and from passing off their products as those of 'The Mask Lab.' Additionally, the order directed the removal of malicious reviews posted on the plaintiff's Google page, providing immediate protection pending final disposal of the suit.

patent interim order · Jan 4, 2021

Unilever Plc v.Pawan Saini

Bombay High Court · INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10134 of 2020 in COMMERCIAL IP SUIT (L) NO. 10129 of 2020

Plaintiffs, Unilever Plc, filed a suit alleging infringement of their registered trademarks (SURF/SURF EXCEL) and copyrights related to detergent packaging by the defendant. The plaintiffs presented evidence of counterfeit goods bearing slavish imitations of their marks and artworks.

patent interim order · Jan 4, 2021

Unilever Plc v.Ashok Kumar (Unknown Person)

Bombay High Court · INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 10132 of 2020 (in Commercial IP Suit (L) No. 10120 of 2020)

Plaintiffs, Unilever Plc, filed an interim application seeking ad-interim reliefs against the defendant, Ashok Kumar (an unknown person), for infringement of their registered trademarks and copyrights, combined with an action for passing off. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendant was marketing and selling counterfeit goods using pirated artworks of SURF EXCEL detergent preparations.

patent interim order · Nov 6, 2020

Unilever Plc. And Anr. v.Ashok Kumar (unknown person/s)

Bombay High Court · IAL-5825-2020 (in Commercial IP Suit (L) No.5820 of 2020)

Unilever Plc. filed an interim application seeking ad-interim reliefs against an unknown defendant for the infringement of its registered trade marks (including LAKME and U-Logo), copyrights in artistic works, and passing off related to its FMCG products. The court granted immediate relief, empowering Additional Special Receivers to seize and seal all infringing goods.

trademark settled · Oct 19, 2020

Shalina Laboratories Private Limited v.Floris Biotech LLP

Bombay High Court · 19.IAL3277.20 (in Comm. I.P.Suit (L) No.3269 of 2020)

The dispute involved Shalina Laboratories Private Limited challenging Floris Biotech LLP regarding the use of the trademark FLOCLAV. The parties reached a settlement, with defendants providing undertakings and submitting new labels that were deemed distinctly different from the plaintiffs' artwork/trade dress.

patent mixed · Sep 3, 2019

Royal Dryfruit Range v.Royal Taste Dry Fruits

Bombay High Court · 3.NMCDL-1799-2019

The Bombay High Court disposed of a Commercial IP Suit involving Royal Dryfruit Range versus Royal Taste Dry Fruits. The court accepted an undertaking from the defendant, Royal Taste Dry Fruits, to remove the disputed mark 'ROYAL' from its signage and packaging, as well as withdraw its trademark application. A short extension was granted for compliance, effectively settling the immediate dispute through mutual agreement and judicial acceptance of the undertakings.

patent mixed · Sep 3, 2019

Royal Dryfruit Range v.Royal Taste Dry Fruits

Bombay High Court · 3.NMCDL-1799-2019

The Bombay High Court disposed of a Commercial IP Suit involving Royal Dryfruit Range versus Royal Taste Dry Fruits. The court accepted an undertaking from the defendant, Royal Taste Dry Fruits, to remove the disputed mark 'ROYAL' from its signage and packaging, as well as withdraw its trademark application. A short extension was granted for compliance, effectively settling the immediate dispute through mutual agreement and judicial acceptance of the undertakings.

patent mixed · Sep 3, 2019

Corum Hospitality And Another v.Hotel Varuna And 3 Others

Bombay High Court · NMCDL-1941-2019

This Bombay High Court judgment addressed procedural matters in a commercial IP suit involving trademark disputes between Corum Hospitality and Hotel Varuna. The court accepted undertakings regarding the filing of Vakalatnamas and set out timelines for addressing office objections to the notice of motion. Furthermore, an intervener sought permission to join the proceedings concerning alleged infringement of the 'Bar Stock Exchange' trademark, which was granted procedural allowance.

patent mixed · Aug 14, 2019

Bytedance Ltd. v.Don Cinema

Bombay High Court · 1/2 nmcdl-1908-19(905).doc

This Bombay High Court judgment addressed an urgent application filed by Bytedance Ltd., the registered proprietor of the 'Tiktok' trademark, against Don Cinema. The dispute arose from an alleged announcement by the defendant regarding a web series titled 'Tiktok House.' After the defendant provided an undertaking to the court denying any such release, the plaintiff withdrew its request for ad-interim relief. The court subsequently set out procedural directions for further pleadings and hearing.

trademark The suit was disposed of by confirming the order dated 21st July 2015 passed in the notice of motion, effectively ending the proceedings without a full trial. · Jul 31, 2019

asian paints limited v.jain paints

Bombay High Court · COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.111 OF 2014 WITH LEAVE PETITION NO.107 OF 2014

Asian Paints Limited sued Jain Paints for trademark infringement concerning the marks 'APEX', 'GOLD DRY APEX', and 'AZPER' used on exterior emulsion paints (Class 02). Defendant No. 2 admitted in their written statement that a stay would not significantly impact them as they were not manufacturing, marketing, or selling the infringing goods.

trademark The suit was disposed of by confirming the order dated 21st July 2015 passed in the notice of motion, effectively ending the proceedings without a full trial. · Jul 31, 2019

asian paints limited v.jain paints

Bombay High Court · COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.111 OF 2014 WITH LEAVE PETITION NO.107 OF 2014

Asian Paints Limited sued Jain Paints for trademark infringement concerning the marks 'APEX', 'GOLD DRY APEX', and 'AZPER' used on exterior emulsion paints (Class 02). Defendant No. 2 admitted in their written statement that a stay would not significantly impact them as they were not manufacturing, marketing, or selling the infringing goods.

patent mixed · Jul 1, 2019

Dongguan Tr Bearing Co. Ltd. v.M/s. Harman Overseas and Ors.

Bombay High Court · COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO.142 OF 2014

The Bombay High Court addressed a Commercial IP Suit filed by Dongguan Tr Bearing Co. Ltd. against M/s. Harman Overseas and Ors. The court noted that both parties had initiated applications before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) seeking the rectification of each other's trademarks. Consequently, the judge stayed the ongoing suit until the outcomes of these parallel IPAB proceedings are determined.

patent defendant favorable · Dec 12, 2014

Darius Rutton Kavasmaneck v.Gharda Chemicals Limited

Bombay High Court · NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 3567 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 2932 OF 2011

The Plaintiff, a minority shareholder, filed a derivative action alleging that Defendant No.2 (Chairman/MD) obtained and applied for several patents in his individual name instead of in the name of Defendant No.1 (the company). The court examined whether the plaintiff had locus standi to file this suit on behalf of the company.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →