Judge Profile

Bench:K.Chandru

5 IP cases indexed. Covers copyright, patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

5 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

copyright plaintiff favorable · Oct 30, 2012

Vodafone India Limited v.M/S. R.K. Productions Pvt Ltd

Madras High Court · C.S.No.208 of 2012 (and C.S.No.294 of 2012)

The suits were filed regarding the unauthorized copying, recording, reproduction, and distribution of cinematograph films '3' and 'Dhammu'. The court upheld the maintainability of the John Doe suits and clarified that the interim injunction was limited to blocking specific infringing URLs rather than entire websites. All applications seeking to vacate the existing interim orders were dismissed.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 21, 2012

Salzer Electronics Ltd v.Sg Controls And Switchgear

Madras High Court · O.A.Nos.327 and 328 of 2011 in C.S.No.240 of 2011

The petitioner, Salzer Electronics Ltd., filed applications seeking an interim injunction against the respondents for infringing their registered patent (No. 198122) related to Integral Cam Operated Rotary Switches, alleging identical manufacture and use of product and trade dress. The respondents countered by challenging the validity of the patent under Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 14, 2012

The Applicant (Naga Industries) v.M/S. Lachmi Marain Traders And Others

Madras High Court · Original Application Nos.603 and 604 of 2012 / C.S.NO.497 of 2012

The Madras High Court dismissed the applicant's requests for an interim injunction against trademark infringement and passing off. The court found that despite the similarity between 'NAGA' and 'AAGA', there was no convincing prima facie case, noting that the respondent had been using their mark openly since 2006 with significant advertising expenditure. Furthermore, the court highlighted the delay in the applicant filing suit (only after receiving a cease and desist notice in 2011) as a critical factor against granting immediate relief.

patent defendant favorable · Sep 14, 2009

Vittal Mallya Scientific Research Foundation v.Indfrag Limited

Madras High Court · C.S.No.651 of 2005 (Applications Nos. 2114 to 2116 of 2009)

The applicants filed three applications seeking supplementary instructions to IIT, Madras, to examine whether the respondent's production process for Double Metal Salt of HCA infringed upon the applicants' patents. The court dismissed these applications, holding that they constituted an abuse of the process and were unnecessary since the trial was yet to commence.

patent defendant favorable · Aug 11, 2009

S.Paul Raj v.Tata Consultancy Services Limited

Madras High Court · O.A.Nos.339 and 340 of 2009 in C.S.No.297 of 2009

S.Paul Raj filed two applications seeking an interim injunction against Tata Consultancy Services Limited (TCS) for infringing his copyright and patent regarding his invention, 'FLYGUARD' (e-Passport Smartcard/TCS e-Passport Solution). The applicant claimed TCS was using the concept without permission after initial discussions. However, the court found that the applicant failed to satisfy the ingredients required for granting an interim order.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →