Judge Profile

Bench:Devan Ramachandran

3 IP cases indexed. Covers patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

3 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent plaintiff favorable · Feb 16, 2024

Salish Sham Viswan v.Singing Artists Association Kerala

Kerala High Court · WP(C) NO. 6301 OF 2023

The Kerala High Court ruled in favor of Salish Sham Viswan, who held a trademark registration for 'Singing Artists Association Kerala.' The court set aside an administrative rejection that claimed jurisdiction was lacking because the petitioner's entity was assumed to be registered under the Charitable Societies Act. The judgment clarified that the core issue is whether the name and logo are protected by the Trade Marks Act, allowing the Registrar to reconsider the complaint regarding potential infringement by the respondent.

patent mixed · Jan 24, 2020

Murickens Marketing System Llp v.Alex G. Muricken

Kerala High Court · FAO.No.10 OF 2020

The Kerala High Court addressed an appeal challenging a preliminary injunction granted against Alex G. Muricken for using names similar to the plaintiffs' registered trademarks, such as 'M.G and Murickens Group'. While acknowledging that the lower court had established a prima facie case of trademark infringement based on the similarity of marks and logos, the High Court recognized the appellant's claim regarding his long-standing use of the name 'Muricken Trading Company'. To balance competing interests and ensure substantial justice, the court remanded the matter back to the trial court, granting both parties a further opportunity to present evidence before deciding the injunction.

patent mixed · Jan 23, 2020

K.M.Ahmed Ansari / M/S Oriental Metals India Pvt Ltd v.K.S.Mohammed Ali / M/S Hero Plywoods and Boards

Kerala High Court · FAO.No.12 OF 2019 (in O.S.NO.27/2018)

This appeal before the Kerala High Court challenged a lower court's dismissal of an interim injunction request concerning the trademark 'Oralium'. The appellants argued that the lower court's findings prejudiced the ongoing lawsuit. However, the High Court dismissed the appeal, stating that the previous observations were merely tentative and did not preclude a fair trial. Given that the main suit was already scheduled for trial, the court deemed an interim injunction unnecessary and directed the trial court to expedite the proceedings.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →