Judge Profile

Bench:Biren Vaishnav

3 IP cases indexed. Covers patent matters.

Cases Presided Over

3 cases indexed | Page 1 of 1

patent defendant favorable · Jul 19, 2024

Sonani Industries Pvt. Ltd. v.Galactica Processing Technologies Llp

Gujarat High Court · R/APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 139 of 2023

Sonani Industries Pvt. Ltd. appealed an order from the Additional District Judge-11, Surat, challenging a rejection of its interim injunction application in a patent infringement suit. The plaintiff claimed that defendants were infringing their patented Diamond Holding Devices used in High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) diamond treatment. The Gujarat High Court upheld the trial court's finding, concluding that the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for infringement. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, though the defendants were directed to maintain accurate accounts of revenue related to the disputed technology.

patent defendant favorable · Apr 8, 2024

Sonani Industries Pvt Ltd v.Prime Diamond Tech & Ors.

Gujarat High Court · R/APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 134 of 2023

Sonani Industries Pvt Ltd challenged a trial court order that allowed its former employees, who formed Prime Diamond Tech, to continue their business activities despite allegations of copyright infringement. The appellant claimed that the respondents were using proprietary drawings and confidential information related to High Pressure High Temperature (HPHT) machines for diamond coloring. However, the Gujarat High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the claim of a proprietary right is purely a question of fact requiring expert evidence during trial, and thus, no prima facie case warranted an injunction.

patent defendant favorable · Jun 29, 2018

Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v.Comed Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.

Gujarat High Court · C/AO/125/2000 CAV JUDGMENT

The Gujarat High Court dismissed Torrent Pharmaceuticals' appeal against a lower court order that vacated an interim injunction. The dispute centered on whether Comed Chemicals' brand name, 'CODROXIL', infringed upon Torrent's registered trademark, 'DROXYL'. Despite arguments regarding phonetic and visual similarity, the court found no prima facie case for confusion, noting that both names originated from the generic drug 'Cefadroxil' and considering the nature of prescription-only pharmaceutical sales. The appeal was dismissed, directing the lower court to finalize the main suit promptly.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →