Industry Sector

Home Appliances — India Design Cases

5 decisions indexed

Page 1 of 1 · 5 total

design plaintiff favorable · Dec 14, 2023

V Guard Industries Ltd v.Ms Mahavir Home Appliances And Anr. & Anr.

Delhi High Court · CS(COMM) 98/2023

The dispute concerning the registered design for ceiling fans was amicably resolved by both parties. The Defendants recognized the Plaintiff's exclusive rights and agreed to cease production/distribution of similar designs, while also undertaking to withdraw pending cancellation petitions against the design. However, the court noted a separate legal issue regarding the refund of court fees in private settlements.

design plaintiff favorable · Nov 6, 2023

Ttk Prestige Ltd. v.Nirlon Kitchenware Private Ltd.

Madras High Court · C.S. (Comm. Div.) No.159 of 2023

Ttk Prestige Ltd. filed a suit against Nirlon Kitchenware Private Ltd. alleging infringement of its registered designs for pressure cookers and passing off due to the defendant's use of identical shapes, configurations, and phonetically similar marks like 'Svachh'. The court found in favor of the plaintiff.

design interim order · Jul 25, 2012

M/s.Whirpool Of India Ltd. v.M/s.Videocon Industries Ltd.

Bombay High Court · NOTICE OF MOTION (LDG) NO. 1955 OF 2012 in SUIT (LDG) NO. 1675 OF 2012

The plaintiff, a manufacturer of consumer goods, sought an interim injunction against the defendant for infringing its registered washing machine designs (Nos. 223833 and 223835) and for passing off its products as the plaintiff's. The court found that a prima facie case was made out for infringement and passing off, leading to the grant of ad-interim relief.

design plaintiff favorable · Jul 25, 2012

M/s.Whirpool Of India Ltd. v.M/s.Videocon Industries Ltd.

Bombay High Court · NOTICE OF MOTION (LDG) NO. 1955 OF 2012 in SUIT (LDG) NO. 1675 OF 2012

The plaintiff, a manufacturer of consumer products including washing machines, sought an interim injunction against the defendant for infringing two registered designs (Nos. 223833 and 223835) and for passing off its product. The court found that the defendant's product was a deceptive imitation based on the 'judged solely by eye' test, making a prima facie case for infringement.

design defendant favorable · Apr 3, 1984

Niki Tasha India Pvt. Ltd. v.Faridabad Gas Gadgets Pvt. Ltd.

Delhi High Court · null

The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking permanent injunction against the defendants for allegedly infringing their registered design (Kitchenette) for a gas cooking range. The court examined whether the defendant's product (Navjyoti) was a fraudulent imitation and if the plaintiff had established a prima facie case for an interim injunction.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Protecting your design rights?

Design disputes move fast. Arctic's IP team specializes in interim relief, design invalidation, and cross-border enforcement strategies.

Speak to a specialist →