Outcome Category

Settled

at Karnataka High Court

3 settled decisions from Karnataka High Court.

Settled Decisions

3 cases | Page 1 of 1

patent settled · Aug 30, 2023

Quikr India Private Limited v.Sellquikr Private Limited

Karnataka High Court · WP No. 12743 of 2020 (NC: 2023:KHC:30949)

The Karnataka High Court disposed of the writ petition based on a joint compromise memo between Quikr India Private Limited and Sellquikr Private Limited. The core agreement stipulated that Sellquikr acknowledged having no rights over Quikr's registered trademarks and copyrighted material. Furthermore, Sellquikr committed to immediately changing its corporate name by removing 'QUIKR,' taking down all associated websites and applications, transferring the domain name sellquikr.in/ to Quikr, and ceasing any use of Quikr's intellectual property.

patent settled · Jul 17, 2023

M/S Yashram Lifestyle Brands Pvt Ltd v.M/S Gokuldas Intimatewear Private Limited

Karnataka High Court · OS No. 5 of 2022 (NC: 2023:KHC:24814)

The plaintiffs filed an Original Suit seeking a permanent injunction against the defendant for infringing their granted patent (IN 306901) related to 'Fab-Shield Period Panty'. The dispute, which also involved challenges to the patent's validity, was subsequently settled by both parties. A Patent License Agreement was entered into on January 01, 2023, and the suit was disposed of accordingly.

patent settled · Nov 12, 2020

Adj Utility Apps Private Limited & Kyte Technologies Inc. v.Mr. Sumit Rajendra Shaha, Growthpond Technologies Private Limited, Risemetric Inc., & Rankz Inc.

Karnataka High Court · WRIT PETITION NO.10172 OF 2020

This Karnataka High Court judgment records an amicable settlement between the parties involved in a copyright dispute concerning the 'Dukaan' application source code. The complex litigation, which included interim injunctions and technical evaluations by the Indian Institute of Science, was resolved through a Joint Compromise Memo. Key terms include a payment of USD 80,000 to Petitioner No. 2, an allotment of 1% common stock in Respondent No. 2-Company to one of the Petitioners, and mutual waivers of claims regarding both 'Disputed' and 'New Sourcecode'.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →