Outcome Category

Mixed

at Jharkhand High Court

4 mixed decisions from Jharkhand High Court.

Mixed Decisions

4 cases | Page 1 of 1

patent mixed · Jan 31, 2024

The State Of Jharkhand v.Rohit Kumar Gupta & Anr.

Jharkhand High Court · L.P.A No. 510 of 2023

The Jharkhand High Court, exercising its Letters Patent Appellate Jurisdiction, disposed of multiple appeals filed by The State of Jharkhand against various respondents. These appeals were decided based on the judgment passed in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous precedents. The court provided further clarifications and directions while settling these complex patent-related disputes.

patent mixed · Jan 31, 2024

The State Of Jharkhand v.Rohit Kumar Gupta & Anr.

Jharkhand High Court · L.P.A No. 510 of 2023

The Jharkhand High Court, exercising Letters Patent Appellate Jurisdiction, disposed of multiple Letters Patent Appeals (L.P.A.) on January 31, 2024. The judgment confirmed the disposition of these appeals based on the precedent established in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous cases. This ruling addresses various disputes arising under patent law within the state.

patent mixed · Jan 31, 2024

The State Of Jharkhand v.Rohit Kumar Gupta & Anr.

Jharkhand High Court · L.P.A No. 510 of 2023

The Jharkhand High Court, exercising its Letters Patent Appellate Jurisdiction, disposed of a series of interconnected Letters Patent Appeals (L.P.A.). The judgment confirmed the disposition of these appeals based on the precedent established in L.P.A. No. 203 of 2022 and other analogous cases. This ruling provides clarity and specific directions across multiple patent disputes involving various parties, thereby concluding the appellate proceedings.

patent mixed · Sep 6, 2021

Murlidhar Gyanchandani v.The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court · Cr.M.P. No. 942 of 2017

This petition before the Jharkhand High Court addresses allegations made by R.S.P.L. Health Pvt. Ltd. against M/s Vedanta Tea Agro Industries regarding the misuse of the 'Ghari' Trademark and Copyright. The controversy stems from an ex parte ad interim injunction passed by the District Court, which led to a contempt reference in Delhi. After reviewing the record, the High Court noted that pending proceedings before the Delhi Courts would have far-reaching effects on these cases.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →