Outcome Category

Defendant Favorable

at Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

5 defendant favorable decisions from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai.

Defendant Favorable Decisions

5 cases | Page 1 of 1

copyright defendant favorable · Mar 23, 2017

Dy.CIT-LTU, Centre-1 v.Tata Consultancy Services Ltd.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai · IT7513/Mum/2010

The appeal challenged the Assessing Officer's disallowance of expenses incurred by TCS Ltd. on imported software due to non-deduction of TDS, arguing that the payment constituted 'royalty'. The Tribunal examined whether the purchase was for acquiring a copyrighted article or merely goods for trading purposes.

copyright defendant favorable · Jan 11, 2017

Adit (It) 3(2), Mumbai v.First Advantage P. Ltd, Mumbai

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai · I.T.A. No. 3031/Mum/2010; I.T.A. No. 3032/Mum/2010

The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s decision holding that payments made by First Advantage Pvt. Ltd. for using CSPi software from FADV US were not 'royalty' subject to TDS. The core dispute was whether limited access to copyrighted software constitutes royalty or merely payment for a copyrighted article.

trademark defendant favorable · Dec 5, 2012

Govind Rubber Ltd v.Department Of Income Tax

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai · ITA No. 5740/Mum/2009

The dispute concerned the allowability of claiming depreciation on the trade mark/brand name "GRL International" which was developed by Govind Rubber Ltd. The Revenue argued that the expenditure was merely advertisement and thus revenue in nature, while the Assessee contended it constituted an intangible asset eligible for capitalization and depreciation.

patent defendant favorable · May 27, 2008

Department Of Income Tax v.Solid Works Corporation, Mumbai

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai · ITA No.5097/Mum/2008

The appeal was filed by the Department of Income Tax, arguing that payments received by Solid Works Corporation for its shrink-wrap software constituted royalty under the Indo-US DTAA. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, finding that the payment was merely for the purchase of a copyrighted article and not a right to use copyright.

patent defendant favorable · Mar 29, 2006

Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax v.Modella Woollens Ltd.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Mumbai

The Revenue appealed against an order that allowed a disallowance of legal fees paid by the assessee to protect its brand name, 'Modella', from a dispute with M/s Modella Knitwear Ltd. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, ruling that expenditure for protecting business assets is revenue in nature.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →