Outcome Category

Plaintiff Favorable

at Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore

4 plaintiff favorable decisions from Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore.

Plaintiff Favorable Decisions

4 cases | Page 1 of 1

patent plaintiff favorable · Dec 1, 2011

Kwality Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. v.Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax Circle-11(5), Bangalore

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore · ITA No.1223(Bang)/2009

Kwality Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. transferred its intellectual property rights (trade marks, designs, and copyrights) related to 'Kwality' biscuits to M/s.Britania Industries Ltd. for ₹30 crores. The Assessing Officer taxed this receipt as long-term capital gains, arguing that the transfer included the right to manufacture. The Tribunal ultimately held that the right to market was distinct from the right to manufacture.

copyright plaintiff favorable · Jan 20, 2006

Mphasis Bfl Ltd. v.Income Tax Officer (Taxation)

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore · null

The assessee, Mphasis Bfl Ltd., challenged the demand raised by the Income Tax Officer regarding non-deduction of tax at source on payments made for purchasing computer software from non-residents. The core issue was whether these payments constituted royalty under the Income Tax Act, given that the company only acquired a right to use the software, not the underlying copyright.

trademark plaintiff favorable · Mar 30, 2004

Bpl Refrigeration Ltd. v.Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore

The assessee, Bpl Refrigeration Ltd., paid Rs. 6 crores to M/s BPL Ltd. for the right to use the registered trademark "BPL" for ten years. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) held that this transaction was a sham designed for tax avoidance and disallowed the expenditure. The Tribunal ruled that since the payment was not an outright purchase but a limited-period license, it constituted admissible revenue expenditure.

trademark plaintiff favorable · Mar 30, 2004

Bpl Refrigeration Limited v.Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal - Bangalore

The assessee, Bpl Refrigeration Limited (part of the BPL Group), paid Rs. 6 crores to M/s. BPL Limited for the right to use the registered trade mark "BPL" for ten years. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) held that this was a sham transaction designed for tax avoidance and disallowed the expense. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding that the payment was legitimate revenue expenditure.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →