Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai

4 decisions indexed · India ·
patent 4

4 cases · page 1 of 1

patent plaintiff favorable · Jan 4, 2007

Commissioner Of Central Excise v.H.K. Rolling Mills Engg. P. Ltd.

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai

The Revenue appealed against a decision regarding whether H.K. Rolling Mills Engg. P. Ltd. was liable to pay Service Tax on license fees collected for using Thermex Cooling System technology. The Tribunal found that since the respondents were providing technical expertise, assistance, and supervision related to the patented technology, they were rendering engineering services under the Finance Act, 1994.

patent remanded · Sep 5, 2006

German Remedies Ltd. v.Commissioner Of Central Excise

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai · null

German Remedies Ltd. challenged the Commissioner's decision regarding the classification and duty rate for its Acetyl Salicylic Acid (ASA) tablets. The dispute centered on whether the product, which was previously classified as a patent/proprietary medicament due to branding, should be treated as a generic product after dropping the trade mark. The Tribunal found that 'ASA' is merely an abbreviation of the chemical name and not a proprietary designation.

patent plaintiff favorable · May 20, 2005

Pfizer Ltd. v.Commissioner Of Central Excise

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai · null

The appellant (a medicament manufacturer) entered into an agreement with Pfizer Inc. to receive technical know-how and use patented technology for manufacturing pharmaceuticals. The Department levied Service Tax on payments made to Pfizer, classifying it as 'engineering consultancy'. The Tribunal ruled that since the transaction was a license/transfer of intellectual property know-how, not professional engineering advice, the levy of Service Tax was unwarranted.

patent defendant favorable · Jan 6, 2005

Siemens Ltd. v.Commissioner Of Customs

Customs, Excise and Gold Tribunal - Mumbai · 2005(99)ECC449

Siemens Ltd. challenged the Customs Department's order which held that lump-sum payments related to technical know-how and royalty for manufacturing products in India were includible in the assessable value. The Tribunal ruled that such payments, when tied to indigenous manufacture using technical assistance, should not be included in the import valuation.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →