Chattisgarh High Court

3 decisions indexed · India ·
patent 3

3 cases · page 1 of 1

patent mixed · Feb 12, 2026

M/S Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited v.Mr. Mukesh Goyal and others

Chattisgarh High Court · MA No. 66 of 2024 (2026:CGHC:7726-DB)

The Chhattisgarh High Court admitted an appeal challenging a lower court's rejection of an interim injunction application concerning trademark infringement and passing off. The appellant, M/S Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited (owner of GOEL), argued that the respondents were deceptively using 'GOYAL GLOBAL' in the steel goods market to capitalize on its goodwill. While directing the Commercial Court to decide the main suit expeditiously, the High Court maintained an interim restraint order preventing the named respondents from using the disputed marks until the final judgment.

patent defendant favorable · Jul 1, 2025

Chandan Sadija & Vikas Nahlani v.Neeraj Jewellery & Nishant Gupta

Chattisgarh High Court · WP227 No. 581 of 2025

The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging the Commercial Court's jurisdiction in a trademark infringement and passing off suit. The petitioners argued that the court lacked territorial and pecuniary jurisdiction, as the original trademark originated outside Chhattisgarh. However, the High Court upheld the lower court's finding, noting that the defendants were operating within Chhattisgarh and that the plaintiffs had properly pleaded their cause of action and valued the suit above the required threshold for commercial court jurisdiction.

patent mixed · Jul 9, 2024

M/S Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited v.Mr. Mukesh Goyal and others

Chattisgarh High Court · MA No. 66 of 2024 (2026:CGHC:7726-DB)

The Chhattisgarh High Court admitted an appeal challenging a lower court's rejection of an interim injunction application concerning trademark infringement and passing off. The appellant, M/S Shri Bajrang Power And Ispat Limited (owner of GOEL), argued that the respondents were deceptively using 'GOYAL GLOBAL' in the steel goods market to capitalize on its goodwill. While directing the Commercial Court to decide the main suit expeditiously, the High Court maintained an interim restraint order preventing the named respondents from using the disputed marks until the final judgment.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a similar IP matter?

Arctic Invent is a specialist IP firm with deep litigation expertise across India, EU, US, and UK. Our team uses data-driven strategy to build stronger cases.

Consult our team →