C.Prakash v. S.N. Media

OSA (CAD) No.68 of 2021

C.Prakash appealed an order that vacated an initial injunction granted in his favour against S.N. Media. The dispute centered on whether C.Prakash's assignment of digital dubbing rights for films 'Chingari' and 'Shrikanta' was invalid because the first defendant claimed non-payment of consideration. The court held that copyright assignment does not require payment of consideration to be valid.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Madras High Court
Case Number
OSA (CAD) No.68 of 2021
Judge(s)
Sanjib Banerjee,P.D.Audikesavalu

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in copyright matters before Madras High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in C.Prakash vs S.N. Media is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

copyrightnull

Urmi Juvekar ChiangvsGlobal Broadcast News Limited

The Plaintiff, a script-writer, claimed that the Defendants were infringing her copyright and breaching confidentiality by broadcasting a program titled 'Summer Showdown'. The Plaintiff asserted that this program was based on her original literary work, the concept note for 'Work in Progress', which she had shared with the Defendants. The Court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining the Defendants from further infringement or breach of confidence.

copyrightITA No. 264/Del/2008

Csg International LtdvsDdit International Taxation Circle 1

The assessee (Csg International Ltd) appealed against an order taxing revenue earned from supplying software as 'royalty'. The core dispute was whether the payment for using copyrighted software constituted a transfer of copyright rights or merely a license to use a copyrighted article. The Tribunal relied on Supreme Court judgments, concluding that non-exclusive licenses do not attract royalty under DTAAs.

copyrightC.S.No.603 of 2014

Trustees, Jesus Redeems MinistriesvsThe Bible Society of India

The plaintiff Trust printed the Holy Bible in Tamil language. The defendant sent a Cease and Desist notice alleging copyright infringement. The plaintiff argued that no existing copyright subsists in the joint authorship work (Bower Version) after the statutory period, and the threat was groundless. The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff.

copyrightFAO(OS) (COMM) 268/2022 and FAO(OS) (COMM) 303/2022

Tv Today Network LimitedvsNews Laundry Media Private Limited

Tv Today Network Limited (Plaintiff) filed a suit alleging defamation, disparagement, and copyright infringement against News Laundry Media Private Limited (Defendant). The dispute centered on derogatory content aired by the Defendant. The court found that commercial disparagement was made out and granted an interim order directing the removal of specific defamatory remarks.

copyrightW. P. No. 782 of 1966 (and related petitions)

A.V. MeiyappanvsCommissioner Of Commercial Taxes

A film producer challenged assessments made by commercial tax authorities who sought to include payments received for leasing exploitation rights of his films as assessable sales turnover. The petitioner argued that these were not sales of goods but realizations of copyrighted rights, falling outside the scope of the Sales Tax Act. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that no sales turnover was involved and thus the tax and penalty levies were illegal.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Copyright infringement or licensing dispute?

From digital piracy to content licensing, Arctic's copyright practice covers enforcement, licensing structuring, and fair-use defences.

Speak to a specialist →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar copyright matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call