Times Internet Ltd. v. Jonathan S. And Another

CS(OS) 1742/2007

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Times Internet Ltd., granting permanent injunctions against the infringement of its brand 'Indiatimes'. The court recognized that Indiatimes, a coined word associated with extensive e-commerce operations, held significant goodwill and reputation. Furthermore, the plaintiff was awarded damages, affirming the protection afforded to established online brands.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court
Case Number
CS(OS) 1742/2007
Judge(s)
G.S.Sistani

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Delhi High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in Times Internet Ltd. vs Jonathan S. And Another is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademark

Sona Ana Pana Balraj And Ors.vsS.P. Vadivel Nadar And Sons And Anr.

The appeals challenged the registration of the geographical name 'Manthithope' as a trade mark for medicinal oils. The court ultimately dismissed the appeals on the ground that the validity of the registration could not be canvassed in the present proceedings because collateral proceedings for rectification were already pending under the Trade Marks Act, 1940.

trademark2023:BHC-OS:4487

Maharashtra Safe Chemists And Distributors Alliance LimitedvsSachin Bhausaheb Bhalekar & Anr.

The Bombay High Court dismissed the suit filed by Maharashtra Safe Chemists And Distributors Alliance Limited against Sachin Bhausaheb Bhalekar and others. The court found that since the disputed trademark was successfully removed from the register via a rectification petition, and the defendant provided affidavits confirming no commercial use of the mark had ever occurred, all prayers in the original suit were rendered infructuous. This decision effectively closed the infringement proceedings.

trademarkCS(COMM) 49/2024

Khadi And Village Industries CommissionvsMr Ashish Singh And Ors

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction in favor of the Khadi And Village Industries Commission against Mr. Ashish Singh and others. The Plaintiff, a statutory body protecting the 'KHADI' mark, alleged that Defendants were deceptively using similar marks like 'KHADI ORGANIC' on various products and websites to exploit public goodwill, particularly around religious events. The Court found a prima facie case for infringement and passed orders restraining the defendants from manufacturing or selling goods under infringing marks and mandating the suspension of the associated domain name.

trademarkC.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 84/2022

International Foodstuffs Co. LlcvsVijay Kumar Mittal And Pawan Kumar And ...

The dispute between International Foodstuffs Co. Llc and Vijay Kumar Mittal was resolved through mediation before the Delhi High Court. The parties entered into a comprehensive settlement agreement, acknowledging each other's proprietary rights in the trademark 'ALLEGRO' across different product categories and jurisdictions. This resolution required both parties to withdraw existing legal actions and abide by specific usage restrictions for the mark.

trademarkW.P.(C)-IPD 54/2021

Amit SoodvsUnion Of India And Ors.

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Amit Sood, granting cancellation of the mark 'ROSHAN' (No. 1324435) registered by the respondents under Class 42. The court found that the petitioner was the prior adopter and user of the name since the 1960s, establishing extensive goodwill in the photography sector. This judgment underscores the principle that prior use and established reputation outweigh subsequent trademark registration when seeking cancellation.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call