Sancheti Applicance Pvt Ltd. v. C.Lal Marketing Pvt Ltd. & Anr

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 134/2022 & C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 361/2021

The Delhi High Court disposed of two petitions filed by Sancheti Applicance Pvt Ltd. against C.Lal Marketing Pvt Ltd. The challenge to the respondent's marks, which were under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, was rendered moot because the impugned trademarks had expired and subsequently been removed from the Register due to non-renewal. Consequently, the petitioner sought and received permission to withdraw the proceedings.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court
Case Number
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 134/2022 & C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 361/2021
Judge(s)
C. Hari Shankar

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Delhi High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in Sancheti Applicance Pvt Ltd. vs C.Lal Marketing Pvt Ltd. & Anr is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademarkCS(COMM) 761/2016

Rajkumar SabuvsKaushalya Devi Sabu & Ors.

The Delhi High Court granted an application by the Plaintiff, Rajkumar Sabu, allowing for the appointment of Local Commissioners. The dispute centers on the unauthorized use of the registered trademark 'SACHAMOTI' by the Defendants, who continued to sell products bearing the registration symbol (®) despite prior court orders prohibiting such usage. The commissioners were authorized to inspect premises, seize infringing goods and packaging, and take related documentation.

trademarkC.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 161/2021

STP LimitedvsRegistrar Of Trade Marks, New Delhi

The Delhi High Court allowed STP Limited's appeal against the refusal of its trademark application 'SHALIMARK'. The initial rejection was based on similarity to earlier marks. However, the court permitted the application to proceed by restricting the scope of goods, specifically removing 'building material (non-metallic)' from the list. This decision allows the mark to be advertised in the trade mark journal for further opposition proceedings.

trademarkC.A.(COMM.IPD-TM) 72/2025

Jsw Mg Motor India Private LimitedvsThe Registrar Of Trade Marks & Anr.

The Delhi High Court heard an appeal filed by JSW MG Motor India Private Limited challenging the Registrar of Trade Marks' order that treated their application as abandoned due to non-appearance. The Appellant argued that their newly engaged counsel made reasonable attempts to join the virtual hearing but was unable to do so because the VC link was sent to the previous counsel. The Court prima facie agreed with the Appellant, finding that the inability to attend was not attributable to the new counsel. Consequently, notice was issued to the Respondents, and the matter was listed for further consideration.

trademark(T) OP (TM) No.507 & 541 of 2023

Makemytrip (India) Private LimitedvsTickmytrip Services Private Limited

The Madras High Court dismissed Original Petitions filed by Makemytrip seeking the rectification and cancellation of Tickmytrip's registered trademarks (Nos. 2801898 & 2801899). The court accepted a written undertaking from Tickmytrip stating that they do not intend to renew these trademark registrations once their current term expires on September 2, 2024. Since the marks will lapse, the court found no necessity for further orders regarding cancellation.

trademarkCS(COMM) 577/2025

Bima Sugam India FederationvsA Range Gowda & Ors.

The Delhi High Court confirmed an interim injunction in favor of Bima Sugam India Federation against A Range Gowda & Ors., addressing a dispute over trademark infringement and domain name ownership. The court found that Defendant No. 1 had adopted the 'BIMA SUGAM' mark in bad faith, leading to deceptive similarity with the Plaintiff's established marketplace brand. Consequently, the Court directed the registrar (Defendant No. 2) to transfer the key domain names, www.bimasugam.com and www.bimasugam.in, to the Plaintiff, subject to the final outcome of the suit.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call