Alberto-Culver Usa Inc. v. Nexus Health & Home Care (P) Ltd.

CS (OS) No.2249 /2007

The Delhi High Court addressed the plaintiff's application for an interim injunction against alleged trademark infringement by Nexus Health & Home Care (P) Ltd. The court found a need to strike an equitable balance, issuing a mixed order. While restraining the defendant from using the infringing mark 'Nexxus' in relation to the goods covered by the plaintiff's trademarks, the court allowed the defendant to continue operating under its corporate name in specific states until the final disposal of the suit.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court
Case Number
CS (OS) No.2249 /2007
Judge(s)
Manmohan Singh

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Delhi High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in Alberto-Culver Usa Inc. vs Nexus Health & Home Care (P) Ltd. is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademark2025:BHC-OS:13402

M/s. ARCEE ElectronicsvsM/s. ARCEEIKA

M/s. ARCEE Electronics filed a Commercial IP Suit against M/s. ARCEEIKA alleging infringement of its registered trademark 'ARCEE' and tortious passing off, concerning electronic goods. The core dispute revolved around the territorial jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court to hear the matter. Despite arguments from the Plaintiff that their business activities extended into Mumbai city, the Court found that the Plaint failed to adequately plead or demonstrate that either the Plaintiff carried on business in Mumbai or that any part of the cause of action arose within its limits. Consequently, the suit was returned under Order VII Rule 10 of the Code.

trademarkC.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 46/2022 & I.A. 22650/2023

ITC LimitedvsGodfrey Phillips India Limited & Anr

ITC Limited filed a Rectification Petition seeking the removal of the 'SUN FLAKE' trademark registration held by Godfrey Phillips India Limited. The petition, which also involved striking off certain paragraphs and documents from affidavits, was listed before the Delhi High Court on November 10, 2023. The court accepted notice and scheduled the matter for further hearing on November 21, 2023.

trademarkCS(COMM) 717/2021

Marico LimitedvsNarico Agrovet Private Limited & Anr.

This Delhi High Court order addresses the ongoing trademark infringement suit filed by Marico Limited against Narico Agrovet Private Limited. The court was reviewing Defendant 1's compliance with a previous directive to change its company names to avoid infringing on Marico's registered trademark. However, the defendant raised procedural hurdles related to the unavailability of necessary e-forms from the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA). Consequently, the Court directed the MCA to appear and clarify this position, ensuring that administrative difficulties do not impede the legal process.

trademarkOP(TM)Nos.64 & 65 of 2024

Thilakarasu Venkatasamy trading as Grand Catering CompanyvsBrand Avatar Llp

The Madras High Court dismissed Original Petitions OP(TM)Nos.64 & 65 of 2024 after the parties, Thilakarasu Venkatasamy and Brand Avatar LLP, reached an out-of-court settlement. The petitions sought the removal or rectification of specific trademark entries (Registration Nos. 5795826 and 3843193) in Class 41. Given the amicable resolution between the parties, the court allowed the proceedings to be dismissed without further order on costs.

trademark(T)OP(TM).No.163 of 2023

M/s.Navketan EnterprisesvsSandeep A. Jain and The Registrar of Trade Marks

The Madras High Court dismissed the Original Petition filed by M/s. Navketan Enterprises seeking the removal of an impugned trade mark from the register. The court noted that the petitioner had been instructed to withdraw the petition, citing a deed of assignment dated July 3, 2019, which transferred ownership of the mark to them. Consequently, the proceedings were dismissed as withdrawn.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call