Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd v. Siddharth Mandal And Anr

C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 190/2021

The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd regarding a petition seeking cancellation of a trademark registration. The court observed that the subject mark's registration had expired on March 5, 2022, and the mandatory renewal period, including the grace period, had lapsed without action by the respondent. Consequently, the court directed the concerned party to remove the non-renewed mark from the Register of Trade Marks.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court - Orders
Case Number
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 190/2021
Judge(s)
Amit Bansal

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in trademark matters before Delhi High Court - Orders. Understanding the court's reasoning in Datt Mediproducts Pvt Ltd vs Siddharth Mandal And Anr is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

trademarkCM(M) 599/2022

Phenomenon Agents Ltd.vsPowereye Electronics

Phenomenon Agents Ltd. filed a fresh suit against Powereye Electronics under the Trademark and Copyright Act, seeking permanent injunction and relief for passing off. The petitioners challenged an earlier court order that merely adjourned the matter. While the High Court clarified it was not adjudicating the merits of the case, it supported the petitioner's request to expedite the proceedings. Consequently, the Trial Court was directed to take up the matter on 04.07.2022.

trademarkCS(OS) No. 1143 of 2004

FoodworldvsFoodworld Hospitality Pvt. Ltd.

The Delhi High Court addressed a passing off suit filed by Foodworld against Foodworld Hospitality Pvt. Ltd., concerning the use of the 'FOODWORLD' trade name in the food business. The court found that while the Defendant could continue its current operations, it was granted a conditional injunction. This means the Defendant is prohibited from using the mark if it enters the highly similar fields of institutional and outdoor catering services, thereby protecting the Plaintiff's goodwill.

trademarkC.S.No.753 of 2008

The Institute Of Chartered Financial Analysis of IndiavsNew Horizons Educational Institute Pvt. Ltd

The Institute Of Chartered Financial Analysis of India filed a civil suit against New Horizons Educational Institute Pvt. Ltd, alleging infringement and passing off related to the registered trademark 'CFA'. The plaintiff sought permanent injunctions and damages. Although the court confirmed its jurisdiction under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, the suit was ultimately dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's counsel failing to provide instructions.

trademarkCS (COMM) 154/2021

Godrej Properties Ltd.vsAshok Kumar & Anr.

In this ongoing trademark infringement suit, the Delhi High Court addressed the delay in deactivating infringing domain names. The court emphasized that Domain Name Registrars (DNRs) like GoDaddy must process valid requests from the plaintiff, especially when they relate to misuse of a protected mark. To resolve the dispute, the court directed GoDaddy to file an affidavit explaining why certain domains remain active and providing full details of the domain registrants.

trademark32-IAL1606-2021 IN COMIPL1604-2021

Yogi Ayurvedic Products Pvt LtdvsThe Yogi And 2 Ors

The Plaintiff, a private limited company, filed an interim application seeking protection for its registered and formative marks under 'YOGI' against the Defendants. The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants were infringing these marks and attempting to pass off their goods using 'THE YOGI' online. The Court found a prima facie case made out and permitted the plaintiff to proceed with the ad-interim relief application.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Facing a trademark dispute?

Arctic's TM litigation team handles ~120 trademark matters per year across India, EU, and UK. From oppositions to infringement actions, we build winning arguments from precedent.

Talk to our TM team →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar trademark matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call