The Press Trust Of India Limited v. Navbharat Press (Bhopal Pvt. Ltd.)

CS(OS) No. 146/2011

The Press Trust Of India Limited filed a suit against Navbharat Press (Bhopal Pvt. Ltd.) alleging unauthorized copying and reproduction of its proprietary news articles in their publications, 'Central Chronicle' and 'Navbharat'. The plaintiff asserted that as the owner of copyright in the content created by its employees, it held exclusive rights to reproduce and disseminate the work. Despite issuing legal notices, the defendants continued the alleged infringement. The court found that the defendants' publications were verbatim copies or colorable imitations of the plaintiff's copyrighted works. Consequently, the Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction restraining further infringement and awarded punitive damages of Rs. 5 lac to the plaintiff.

Jurisdiction
India
Court
Delhi High Court
Case Number
CS(OS) No. 146/2011
Judge(s)
Manmohan Singh

Practitioner Note

This case demonstrates the evidentiary and procedural standards applied in copyright matters before Delhi High Court. Understanding the court's reasoning in The Press Trust Of India Limited vs Navbharat Press (Bhopal Pvt. Ltd.) is valuable context for structuring arguments or assessing risk in similar proceedings.

Related Cases

copyrightI.T.A. Nos. 926 & 927/Bang/2012

M/s. Shell India Markets Private LimitedvsIncome Tax Department (represented by ITO International Taxation)

The assessee, Shell India Markets Private Limited, challenged the tax department's order holding that payments made for accessing copyrighted software constituted royalty and were liable for TDS. The Tribunal examined whether the payment was for a mere user right or a transfer of copyright rights. Following precedents favoring the assessee (specifically citing the Delhi High Court), the Tribunal held that the sale/transfer of software in this context is not taxable as royalty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the assessee was found not liable to deduct tax at source.

copyrightOriginal Side Appeal No.307 of 2012 (against A.No.2275 of 2012 in C.S.No.258 of 2012)

R.K.Productions Pvt. Ltd.vsM/s.N.K.Theatres Pvt. Ltd.

R.K.Productions Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff/Appellant) sued M/s.N.K.Theatres Pvt. Ltd. (Defendant No. 1) for copyright infringement related to the Telugu dubbing and remake rights of its movie '3', after the Defendant failed to pay the final installment amount due under the assignment agreement. The Defendant filed an application seeking arbitration, arguing that all disputes should be referred to arbitration. The High Court allowed the appeal, holding that since the suit involves complex issues mixing payment dispute with copyright infringement against multiple parties, it cannot be bifurcated for arbitration.

copyright2023:BHC-AS:37466

Manya Vejju Alias Mv KasivsSapna Bhog

This appeal before the Bombay High Court concerned an order restraining the appellant, Manya Vejju, from publishing statements alleging copyright infringement against the respondent, Sapna Bhog. The dispute centered on allegations of plagiarism between their respective romance genre literary works. The core legal question was whether the threat of infringement action fell under Section 60 of the Copyright Act, 1957. The High Court found that the trial court's inquiry into the merits of the copyright claim exceeded its remit and consequently quashed the impugned order, remitting the matter back for a fresh determination.

copyrightLPA No. 448/2011

Entertainment Network India LtdvsSuper Cassettes Industries Ltd & Ors.

This appeal challenged various orders passed by a single Judge and the Copyright Board concerning copyright works. The core legal issue addressed was whether an order passed by one tribunal or court could be automatically applied as a precedent to another case, especially where the factual matrix differed.

copyrightSuit No. 38/2010

M/s. Super Cassettes Industries LimitedvsM/s. Sri Ganesh Video

The plaintiff, M/s. Super Cassettes Industries Limited (T-Series), filed a suit seeking permanent injunction and damages against defendants for illegally manufacturing and marketing VCDs of three specific Kannada films (Parvathi Kalyana, Sampathige Saval, Giri Kanye) which the plaintiff claimed to have acquired exclusive copyright rights over. The court found that the defendants willfully infringed the plaintiff's copyright and consequently decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff.

Arctic Invent — IP Strategy

Copyright infringement or licensing dispute?

From digital piracy to content licensing, Arctic's copyright practice covers enforcement, licensing structuring, and fair-use defences.

Speak to a specialist →

Disclaimer: This page contains an automated summary based on publicly available judicial records. The content is generated for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Always verify details against the original source judgment before relying on this information for any legal purpose. If you believe any information is inaccurate, please contact us.

Strategy Consult

Facing a similar copyright matter?

Arctic's litigation team uses precedent data like this to build winning arguments.

Get a Strategy Call